andres

andres closed issue heavy-duty/rig#121

2026-07-30 17:36:59 +00:00

No Actions runner has ever served this repo — every check on every commit is permanently pending

andres closed issue heavy-duty/rig#117

2026-07-30 17:36:22 +00:00

No Forgejo Actions runner is attached to this repo — CI, the label reconciler, and the release flow have never run

andres closed issue heavy-duty/rig#125

2026-07-30 17:34:07 +00:00

bootstrap's BOX_MANUAL is not a pasteable command when a host has two candidates

andres merged pull request heavy-duty/rig#114

2026-07-30 17:00:22 +00:00

feat: install channel is forge-agnostic (RIG_HOST / BOX_HOST)

andres closed issue heavy-duty/rig#111

2026-07-30 17:00:22 +00:00

rig's own install channel still hardcodes GitHub (install.sh, bootstrap's box fetch)

andres pushed to main at heavy-duty/rig

2026-07-30 17:00:22 +00:00

12803b2b97 Merge pull request 'feat: install channel is forge-agnostic (RIG_HOST / BOX_HOST)' (#114) from build/111-install-channel-forge-agnostic into main

a3ec47113a fix: emit BOX_MANUAL line-by-line; bare command for single candidate

1c9a245595 fix: BOX_MANUAL is pasteable try:/or: lines, not prose shell

ec73c86de7 fix: shellcheck SC2129, BOX_MANUAL lists candidates, drive box_install_urls

c7d56d3b80 docs: shorten changelog.d/111.md under the 300-char entry guard

Compare 9 commits »

andres commented on issue heavy-duty/rig#111

2026-07-29 21:11:26 +00:00

rig's own install channel still hardcodes GitHub (install.sh, bootstrap's box fetch)

also, add the Issue queue labels missing!!

andres commented on issue heavy-duty/rig#111

2026-07-29 21:10:42 +00:00

rig's own install channel still hardcodes GitHub (install.sh, bootstrap's box fetch)

@cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl is offline right now.. decide who is the best to take the development and apply the feedback

andres commented on issue heavy-duty/rig#126

2026-07-29 21:09:55 +00:00

Forgejo has no discussions — triage's intake door has no surface on this instance

we will use a label in the issue i want to start a triage

andres closed issue heavy-duty/rig#126

2026-07-29 21:09:55 +00:00

Forgejo has no discussions — triage's intake door has no surface on this instance

andres commented on pull request heavy-duty/rig#114

2026-07-29 15:05:18 +00:00

feat: install channel is forge-agnostic (RIG_HOST / BOX_HOST)

A side note.. If you see there is a lack of labels, or etc to mark properly the issues and comply with the Ceremony guidelines, just let me know, and create the necessary issues to solve this.…

andres commented on issue heavy-duty/rig#112

2026-07-29 13:40:49 +00:00

rig's ceremony actions won't resolve on Forgejo — make the 8 first-party uses: absolute

I close the 113 PR, and before clsoing this, please create the issue related to the missing labels so we can fix it in another round (just create the issue)... After that i will close this.

andres pushed to main at heavy-duty/rig

2026-07-29 13:37:35 +00:00

90cbfe0057 Merge pull request 'fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo' (#113) from build/112-ceremony-uses-absolute into main

54efc17246 docs: the changelog fragment says what changed and stops

25f337494c fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo

Compare 3 commits »

andres merged pull request heavy-duty/rig#113

2026-07-29 13:37:34 +00:00

fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo

andres closed issue heavy-duty/rig#112

2026-07-29 13:37:34 +00:00

rig's ceremony actions won't resolve on Forgejo — make the 8 first-party uses: absolute

andres commented on issue heavy-duty/rig#112

2026-07-29 13:13:35 +00:00

rig's ceremony actions won't resolve on Forgejo — make the 8 first-party uses: absolute

I need you 3 see how to solve this -> "Correction to my note above: I said I was adding claimed. I could not — the label does not exist in this repo.

Measured just now against the labels…

andres commented on pull request heavy-duty/rig#113

2026-07-29 13:12:08 +00:00

fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo

perfect.. are we ready to close this PR ? this would close the issue 112 right ?

andres commented on pull request heavy-duty/rig#113

2026-07-29 12:53:46 +00:00

fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo

also #3512., #3524, #3476. links are not working, why ?

andres commented on pull request heavy-duty/rig#113

2026-07-29 12:52:31 +00:00

fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo

The Fork mistake was made by me, this should be a fork, i know, and its not gonna happen in the future. Before merging:

"The panel= / triage-actors roster, a scope:ceremony taxonomy row,…

andres commented on issue heavy-duty/rig#112

2026-07-29 12:02:40 +00:00

rig's ceremony actions won't resolve on Forgejo — make the 8 first-party uses: absolute

perfect!! @cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl open a new PR with all of this summarized.. Then, you have to review all @grok-reviewer-andresmgsl @kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl @codex-reviewer-andresmgsl …