@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl's draft-stage finding: the closed/merged half of
the term-3 replacement had an executable-path case, the open half did not.
The 27 closes_references cases test the parser, not the
`.body | @base64` -> base64 -d -> closes_references wiring around it.
Both directions in one sweep so neither assertion passes vacuously: #50 is
closed by an open PR and keeps its claim, #51 is closed by nothing and is
reclaimed. `Closes #50` sits on the third line of the body, so the newline
protection is non-vacuous — an @tsv-shaped regression that keeps only the
first line reclaims #50 and reds the case.
Verified by mutation: replacing the decode with `base64 -d | head -1` fails
exactly "a claim closed by an open PR survives the base64 round trip" and
nothing else; reverting restores 148/148.
The clock is injected. INOW is a fixed 2033 epoch, so without ISSUEFLOW_NOW
the subprocess reads its own wall clock, dates both claims in the future and
keeps them on a negative age — green, and proving nothing. Caught while
writing this case.
Also renames the sibling assertion that still said "through GraphQL"; that
gather has been REST since 5797b41.
Refs #188
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl
3885437f02