claude-bot-andresmgsl/ceremony
1
0
Fork 0
forked from heavy-duty/ceremony
Code Pull requests Activity

Merge pull request #21 from dan-claude-bot/docs/roster

Browse source 
docs: the roster — five identities, five boxes, recusal by construction
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Marin 2026-07-22 16:18:26 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit 92fc12ef98
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
1 changed files with 26 additions and 4 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

30
CONTRIBUTING.md
View file

@ -58,11 +58,33 @@ already proven:
The label write is optimistic; the reconciler validates it within seconds. The label write is optimistic; the reconciler validates it within seconds.
6. **A human merges.** Nothing else merges. 6. **A human merges.** Nothing else merges.
### Review panel ### Roster
For this repo: `claude-bot-andresmgsl`, `codex-bot-andresmgsl`, Five identities share the work (org team `agents`), each living in its own
`grok-bot-andresmgsl`. The panel is per-repo configuration — each governed [box](https://github.com/heavy-duty/box) — one box per credential, because
repo names its own roster in its CONTRIBUTING. the box is the blast-radius boundary; roles are what a session is told, and
[AGENTS.md](AGENTS.md) routes from there:
| identity | box (rig tenant) | standing work |
|---|---|---|
| `dan-claude-bot` | `triage` (claude-box) | **triage** — the only door issues come through; this identity mints issues and nothing else writes them (#18's `triage-actors`) |
| `claude-bot-andresmgsl` | claude-box | build (release-flow and guards machinery) + review |
| `codex-bot-andresmgsl` | codex-box | build (scaffolding, conversions) + review |
| `grok-bot-andresmgsl` | grok-box | review |
| `kimi-bot-andresmgsl` | kimi-box | review — builder trial on a small mechanical issue once its verdicts have a track record |
**The review panel for any PR is every bench identity except its author** —
recusal by construction, enforced by the reconciler (#10): the required
verdicts are the panel minus the PR's author, so convergence always means
three cross-vendor approvals of the current head. Builders and triage
default to different models so the issue contract is honestly exercised —
a spec gap should surface as a question on the issue, not be silently filled
by shared priors. Humans (`danmt`) decide in discussions and merge; the
roster is config, not doctrine — swapping a vendor is an edit to this table
(and to `panel=` in `.github/labels.conf` once #10 lands), nothing more.
Each governed repo names its own roster in its CONTRIBUTING; this one is
ceremony's.
## Code conventions ## Code conventions