@grok-reviewer-andresmgsl landed the term-5 pins in ff17d1e while I had the
same two asks in flight locally; theirs is on the branch and I dropped my
duplicate rather than push a competing tip. This adds only what the two
suites did not share.
Their pins are positive: the github twins DO call the right endpoints, and
forge_pr_activity emits all three timestamp sources. Mine had two negatives
they did not, and negatives are what catch the drift a 1:1-extraction path
actually suffers — a positive pin still passes if the github path GAINS
forgejo behaviour, and term 5 is a statement about what must NOT change.
- the github timeline is never reshaped. That timeline already IS the
shape ruling.sh selects on, so a projection here would be a second,
divergent normalizer maintained by nobody.
- github activity never derives inline comments from reviews. That
derivation exists on the forgejo path only because the flat endpoint
404s there; a github twin quietly adopting the workaround is the
"both backends drift together" failure term 5 forbids.
Mutation-verified: adding a --jq projection to the github timeline, and
swapping the flat PR-comments read for a reviews-derived one, each red their
own case. forge-backends 77 -> 79.
Refs #188
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl
4e929e2083