The repo has no tests and no CI, and everything in #9/#10/#13 was verified
against a stubbed incus. The interesting failures aren't in the bash — they're
in what Incus actually does, which is exactly what a stub gets wrong. So the
drill runs the real thing on a host you can format.
A. Incus semantics — the assumptions claudebox is built on, probed directly:
the user.claudebox=1 tag read (now on the path of every box command in
#13), the list filter, the CSV shape, the state string, whether rename
really refuses a running instance, the snapshot-list field order.
B. The claudebox surface — mint, list, info, snapshot, clone-from-snapshot-of-
a-renamed-box, rename, the escape hatch, the rm guard, the CLI contract —
and the boundary: an instance claudebox did NOT mint has down/rm/hatch
aimed at it, must refuse all three, and must still be standing after.
C. Isolation — from inside a real box: public egress works, box → host is
blocked, box → RFC1918 is dropped.
Destructive by design, and it says so before it starts: it asks for consent
(--yes to skip), and refuses outright with no TTY. Without /dev/kvm it reports
that the VM trust boundary was NOT validated rather than passing on a container.
