BUILDER.md's review round assumed ready-throughout, so a builder or
reviewer meeting a mid-round draft found behaviour the doctrine never
described. Three points, doctrine not mechanism: the draft phase stays
the builder's through a fix round, ready-for-review is the builder's own
act and no engine's, and where the draft suppressed CI green is proven
at the flip with the request following it — step 1's rule at a stated
moment, not a second rule.
REVIEWER.md gains the reading that keeps a reviewer from misfiling it:
a draft carrying state:addressing is a fix round in progress.
Refs #258
The ruling from discussion #171 as ruled: canonical text in REVIEWER.md
§What you review against item 2 (beside the verify-at-pin sub-bullet it
is the sibling of), short form in BUILDER.md §Building pointing at it.
CONTRIBUTING.md and docs/CONSUMERS.md checked for contradiction or
duplication: none — their pin prose is the mirror/caller pinning rule —
so both are deliberately untouched.
Refs #216
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
One resolution point (panel_for_author) feeds set_required_bots; the
author's row when the conf defines one, the base panel= otherwise, minus
the author in either case. Bracket prefixes are matched quoted so the
case patterns cannot glob (D7, panela= tripwire). configured_label_rows
skips the rows so a dispatch bootstrap cannot mint a label named after
one. BUILDER.md/REVIEWER.md carry the one D9 wording; CONSUMERS.md
publishes the row as unreleased with the parse-failure warning.
Refs #224
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Merging #143 auto-closed #137 with a post-merge criterion unmet: the PR
carried Closes#137 as doctrine required, the criterion could only be
checked after the merge, and the contract was silent on the disagreement
between GitHub's keyword and the pipeline's close authority — the same
disagreement the cross-repo carve-out already resolved, one case over.
BUILDER.md gains the second exception beside the first: when the issue
body marks a criterion post-merge, the same-repo PR uses Refs #N and
triage closes by hand on the evidence. TRIAGE.md makes the criterion
carry its own mechanism; REVIEWER.md lists Refs #N as a spec pointer and
stops treating the reference-only PR as a defect; CONTRIBUTING.md points
at the one home instead of restating. No machinery, no label (#151 D5).
Closes#151
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Workflows are consumed by reference because GitHub materializes them at
run time; docs have no runtime — agents read the working tree — so the
agent-facing set (TRIAGE, BUILDER, REVIEWER, LABELS) vendors into each
governed repo at .ceremony/, byte-identical to the pinned ref and guarded
by docs-sync --check in CI (#19). Role files made self-contained for
vendored reading.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Discussions are where intent lives; issues are minted only by triage;
builders turn one issue into one PR; reviewers converge on verdicts;
humans decide in the discussion and at the merge. LABELS.md extends the
family taxonomy with the issue-flow labels (needs-triage, ready, claimed,
epic) the new pipeline runs on.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
