ceremony/actions/issueflow-reconcile
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl 06f05aebec fix(198): the workflow declares and refuses instead of being exempted by name (#198)
@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl's blocker 1 is right and the filename exemption was
the wrong shape. It exempted the whole FILE — any later `gh` call anywhere in
labels.yml would have ridden in free — and it let the merge ship a step that
dies with `command not found` on every sweep on this forge, which #197's bar
does not permit.

The declaration mechanism already existed; a workflow simply could not reach
it. It can: `CEREMONY_FORGE_CLIENT: gh` in the step's env is the same
declaration actions/refs-not-closing carries, and the refusal that a script
gets from forge_preflight is inline here because a workflow has no shell to
call it from. The dispatch now warns by name, cites #205, and exits 0 rather
than reddening every sweep for a known gap.

So the guard needs no exemption list at all. It now requires the pair —
declared AND refusing — and reports a declaration that carries no refusal,
which is a permission slip for `command not found`.

That predicate was wrong on its first write, and its mutation test caught it:
`refuses_when_unavailable` matched the word `forge_preflight` inside
labels.yml's own comment explaining that it has NO forge_preflight to call. A
guard reading prose as evidence is the blind sweep again, in the guard written
to forbid it. Comments are stripped now, as gh_calls already stripped them.

Blocker 4: the nudge strips a trailing slash from the server URL. Reverting the
strip reds two cases.

Blockers 2 and 3 were already fixed in 97e63ac, before either review landed.

test/run.sh 28 files 0 failed under CI's env; shellcheck 0.10.0 (CI's pin),
actionlint, self-ref, marker, vendored and changelog-armed all clean, with
every file tracked this time.

Refs #198
2026-08-05 12:16:53 +00:00
..
action.yml fix: enforce triage author only on issue arrival 2026-07-23 10:31:15 +00:00
issueflow-reconcile.sh fix(198): the workflow declares and refuses instead of being exempted by name (#198) 2026-08-05 12:16:53 +00:00