forked from heavy-duty/ceremony
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl
877e09e015
issueflow-reconcile has been blind on this forge since the 0.6.0 merge landed. Run 368 — #198's own post-merge acceptance probe — printed: issueflow: no open issues. issueflow: reconciled. over a board of nine. Every Forgejo entry CARRIES the `pull_request` key, valued null on an issue, so `select(has("pull_request") | not)` selects zero rows. Measured again today: #209 (an issue) has the key valued null; #208 and #207 (PRs) have it valued as objects. This is mine. #188 fixed exactly this and the file's own comment at :1113 states the rule, with :1121 already using it correctly. Resolving hunk 4 of the merge I took upstream's board block wholesale and carried the wrong discriminator into three sites — the gather, the release-body gather, and reconcile_issue_pass — in the PR whose stated purpose was to stop blind sweeps reporting success. Cost while it stood: no issue transitions, no claim reclaims, no nudges, no board flags — and no `post-merge` transitions, which is why #192 and #198 both still read `claimed` after their PRs merged, and why #198's own closure criterion could not complete. Two guards, because a comment did not hold: * A GATHER-LEVEL CASE against a Forgejo-shaped fixture — every entry carrying the key. The existing discriminator cases assert jq expressions in isolation and passed throughout this regression; they never ran the gather that uses them, which is precisely how it survived review. * A SOURCE PIN forbidding has("pull_request") on this surface, so a future sync cannot reintroduce it 40 lines below the comment forbidding it. Reverting the board gather reds both. Reverting reconcile_issue_pass reds the pin. test/run.sh 28/28 under jq 1.7 and jq 1.6; issueflow 503/503; shellcheck 0.10.0 and actionlint clean. Refs #210 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 192.md | ||
| 195.md | ||
| 198.md | ||
| 210.md | ||
| README.md | ||
| shape | ||
changelog.d/ — the next release's section, one fragment per issue
Machine-assembled by bin/changelog-assemble (#112): every PR that changes
behavior writes one file here — <issue>.md, the exact prose that will be
published, nothing else — and the release PR folds them all into the next
## X.Y.Z — DATE section of CHANGELOG.md, consuming them. Distinct
filenames never conflict, which is this directory's whole reason to exist.
This README is the marker that keeps the directory tracked when it holds no
fragments (#112 D1) — changelog-armed refuses a tree without it; do not
delete it. The shape sentinel beside it declares the set's shape —
grouped here, so every fragment carries ### headings (#182).