ceremony/changelog.d
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl bada4ffff5 test(issueflow): each of the three sites is caught by behaviour, not only by the pin (#210)
@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl's two scope items, applied before the first review
round rather than after.

1. THE GUARD IS COMMENT-AWARE, WITH CONTROLS. It already stripped comments —
   it has to, because the #188 warning that explains why has("pull_request") is
   wrong contains the string. Without controls that was an untested property,
   and the pressure it creates is real: a raw grep would push a builder into
   deleting the very warning that prevents recurrence. Two fixtures now prove
   it: the explanatory comment is allowed, an executable jq filter is rejected.

2. ALL THREE SITES ARE DRIVEN BY BEHAVIOUR. The pin makes any revert red, but a
   pin proves a string is absent, not that each replacement means the intended
   thing:

     BOARD_RECORDS        the forgejo-shaped board is not read as empty
     release_bodies       an open `release` issue whose gate holds an open
                          member makes a claimable NON-member draw a window
                          flag — empty carriers, no flag, so the row
                          discriminates the site instead of merely reaching it
     reconcile_issue_pass the scalar payload: key-present-null is an issue,
                          object-valued is a PR, key-absent is still an issue

   The release_bodies row did NOT discriminate on its first write — it asserted
   an issue number that BOARD_RECORDS also produces, so reverting the site left
   it green. Caught by mutating each site separately rather than trusting the
   suite total.

Mutation, per site: BOARD_RECORDS 3 red, release_bodies 2 red,
reconcile_issue_pass 2 red.

test/run.sh 28/28; issueflow 510/510; shellcheck 0.10.0 clean.

Refs #210
2026-08-05 14:37:37 +00:00
..
192.md fix(forgejo): a read failure names its verb too, and the tests assert the whole diagnostic (#192) 2026-08-05 13:11:33 +00:00
195.md fix(labels): panel and triage name identities that exist on this forge (#195) 2026-08-04 19:09:16 +00:00
198.md fix(198): the action fails closed, the caller decides scheduling, the guard decides the forge (#198) 2026-08-05 12:30:28 +00:00
210.md test(issueflow): each of the three sites is caught by behaviour, not only by the pin (#210) 2026-08-05 14:37:37 +00:00
README.md feat: ceremony flips to grouped — changelog.d/shape = grouped, five fragments converted, docs per D6 2026-07-25 13:14:05 +00:00
shape feat: ceremony flips to grouped — changelog.d/shape = grouped, five fragments converted, docs per D6 2026-07-25 13:14:05 +00:00

changelog.d/ — the next release's section, one fragment per issue

Machine-assembled by bin/changelog-assemble (#112): every PR that changes behavior writes one file here — <issue>.md, the exact prose that will be published, nothing else — and the release PR folds them all into the next ## X.Y.Z — DATE section of CHANGELOG.md, consuming them. Distinct filenames never conflict, which is this directory's whole reason to exist. This README is the marker that keeps the directory tracked when it holds no fragments (#112 D1) — changelog-armed refuses a tree without it; do not delete it. The shape sentinel beside it declares the set's shape — grouped here, so every fragment carries ### headings (#182).