ceremony/docs
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl e965b15cbf docs: the recurring upstream sync, its standing resolutions, and a guard on where the delta lives (#200)
The third child of #197, written immediately after performing the sync it
describes, while the findings are still first-hand.

docs/UPSTREAM-SYNC.md carries the procedure and the six standing resolutions,
each with the issue that decided it, so they are not re-argued every sync. The
parts that are not obvious from the outside, and that the 0.6.0 sync paid to
learn:

  * THE AUDIT STEP. `git merge` takes upstream's side wherever only upstream
    moved a region, so a function upstream ADDED to a file this tree owns
    arrives with no conflict and no question. Reviewing the hunks cannot find
    it — four reviewers read the same diff and each found a different subset.
    That was eight runtime `gh` call sites in three files and two file types.

  * THE SAME MECHANIC APPLIES TO STATE. A resolved region can remove a producer
    whose consumers auto-merged, and those consumers degrade to empty rather
    than erroring, so nothing goes red. Three such seams in one sync.

  * VERIFY WHERE IT RUNS. "Green locally" was wrong three times, for three
    different reasons: shellcheck-all lints TRACKED files so a new file's first
    lint is meaningless; CI pins shellcheck 0.10.0; and the runner's jq 1.6
    exits 0 where 1.7 exits 4 on `jq -e` with empty input — which was not a
    test problem but a guard accepting an unreadable read.

  * TEST THE MERGE RESULT. Forgejo tests heads, never what two branches produce
    together, and two green PRs did produce a red tree in this sync.

  * AFTER MERGING, CHECK THE SWEEP RECONCILED SOMETHING. The first post-merge
    run was green and had done nothing.

.upstream-ref records the carried commit in machine-readable form beside the
CHANGELOG's prose. test/upstream-delta.test.sh asserts every forge-DECIDING
file is named in the inventory — offline, comment-aware, and refusing rather
than skipping when the ref is missing. Shim CONSUMERS are allowed by name, so
a seventh consumer is silent and a seventh decider is not.

docs/CONSUMERS.md now states that two ceremonies answer to the same version
number and how a consumer says which one it pinned.

Must-fail, both from the issue's test plan: scattering a forge_detect branch
into an unlisted file reds the guard; blanking .upstream-ref reds it too.

test/run.sh 29 files 0 failed under jq 1.7 and jq 1.6; shellcheck 0.10.0,
actionlint, self-ref, marker, vendored and changelog-armed all clean.

Refs #200
2026-08-05 13:36:17 +00:00
..
.gitkeep ci: scaffold test and lint workspace 2026-07-22 16:56:25 +00:00
CONSUMERS.md docs: the recurring upstream sync, its standing resolutions, and a guard on where the delta lives (#200) 2026-08-05 13:36:17 +00:00
UPSTREAM-SYNC.md docs: the recurring upstream sync, its standing resolutions, and a guard on where the delta lives (#200) 2026-08-05 13:36:17 +00:00
VENDORED.txt docs: correct release gate mechanics 2026-08-03 18:26:58 +00:00