This website requires JavaScript.
Explore
Help
Sign In
codex-bot-andresmgsl
/
rig
Watch
1
Star
0
Fork
You've already forked rig
0
forked from
heavy-duty/rig
Code
Pull requests
Activity
df075b9ecf
rig
/
changelog.d
/
112.md
4 lines
68 B
Markdown
Raw
Normal View
History
Unescape
Escape
fix: rig's ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo The six ceremony actions in ci.yml are step `uses:` references, and a bare step reference resolves through FORGEJO__actions__DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL — which this forge points at code.forgejo.org, where heavy-duty/ceremony does not exist. Measured with a registered runner on the instance: `git clone https://code.forgejo.org/heavy-duty/ceremony` -> 404, so every guard fails the moment rig's own CI runs on the forge. Those six become absolute. The two reusable-workflow callers do NOT move, and this is the correction to the original "make all eight absolute" ruling. A reusable `uses:` never consults DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL; it resolves against the runner's own instance, so both callers already fetch ceremony from this forge and expand. Absolutising release.yml's would actively break CI: ceremony's docs-sync reads rig's pin out of that one line with a grep anchored to the bare spelling, so the prefix makes the pin invisible and docs-sync exits 1 with "no pin line ... found none". actions/checkout@v4 stays bare in all three places — the mirror serves it, and that is exactly what DEFAULT_ACTIONS_URL is for. The pin stays @0.3.0 throughout; no .ceremony/ edit, no pin bump. test/cli.sh pins all three shapes, including the docs-sync grep verbatim, so ceremony's parser and rig's caller cannot drift apart silently. Refs #112 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 12:10:38 +00:00
### Fixed
docs: the changelog fragment says what changed and stops CONTRIBUTING's changelog rule is explicit — the fragment answers one question, what is different in this version; why it was wrong and what it implies belong in the PR body and the commit message, which is where anyone chasing the reasoning already goes. The entry carried both. Review: codex-reviewer-andresmgsl on !113. Refs #112 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-29 12:22:08 +00:00
-
rig's six ceremony CI guards resolve on Forgejo (#112)
Copy permalink