From 25d10b084d255263cec1382c8a64535ad368f7a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 09:26:17 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] docs: the changelog fragment cites bare #109 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Maintainer ruling on the issue-number collision raised in the PR body. CONTRIBUTING's rule is "cite the issue or PR — (#96)", and fragments are assembled into CHANGELOG.md verbatim, so a fragment is the one place the convention is actually load-bearing. `forgejo#109` links on neither forge and would seed a second citation spelling in every future fragment. The prose distinction stays where it earns its keep: PR bodies and review comments still write forgejo#N, because that is where a reader has both numbering schemes in front of them at once. --- changelog.d/109.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/changelog.d/109.md b/changelog.d/109.md index fdfbcfc..f49bbb1 100644 --- a/changelog.d/109.md +++ b/changelog.d/109.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ ### Added -- `rig forgejo-runner install|status|remove` registers a Forgejo Actions runner against an instance, jobs in containers on the box's own dockerd (forgejo#109) -- The template registry can be served from any forge — `RIG_TEMPLATES_HOST` (forgejo#109) +- `rig forgejo-runner install|status|remove` registers a Forgejo Actions runner against an instance, jobs in containers on the box's own dockerd (#109) +- The template registry can be served from any forge — `RIG_TEMPLATES_HOST` (#109)