forked from heavy-duty/rig
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl
7aed6ea098
Addresses codex (1538) and kimi (1539): the sweep caught the reported
incident and not the class. Both are right, and there were four sites, not
three.
forgejo-runner-install useradd -> useradd usermod (usermod -aG docker,
reached only after the token has been spent)
users-apply useradd usermod -> + groupadd (called two lines
into convergence), and visudo when a role needs it
bootstrap-tenant NEW site (kimi) — usermod -aG docker runs AFTER
docker and node are installed, so an unguarded
PATH fails it mid-convergence on a changed machine
runner-install unchanged: useradd is the only admin binary it
calls, and declaring more would refuse boxes that
are fine
visudo is checked after the sudo-install block rather than beside the root
check, because until sudo is installed its absence has an innocent cause.
Below that block it does not: sudo is present, so a missing visudo means
/usr/sbin is off PATH. That case is the quiet one — the sudoers block reads
`command -v visudo` as "no sudo on the box means no role needed it", so
apply reported success having granted roles without the escalation those
roles exist for. The other three sites at least crash.
Measured which binaries this covers (Debian 13): useradd, usermod, groupadd,
userdel, groupdel and visudo are /usr/sbin; gpasswd is /usr/bin and so is
NOT affected and deliberately not preflighted. visudo shares the directory
but ships in `sudo`, not `passwd` — which is why it needs its own treatment.
Tests: the sbin-less fixtures could only ever prove the FIRST binary is
named, since useradd wins every race. Six new checks use partial PATHs that
resolve the earlier binaries and withhold exactly one, plus the ordering
assertions (no token prompt, no group created) and the negative case — a
users file needing no sudo must NOT be refused for a missing visudo.
Refs #139
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| cli.sh | ||
| db-integration.sh | ||
| drill.sh | ||
| install-lifecycle.sh | ||
| release.sh | ||