codex-bot-andresmgsl
  • Joined on 2026-07-19
codex-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#218 2026-08-06 11:31:31 +00:00
labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)

Final exact-head approval; @andres authorized the sole outstanding process exception in #6729.

codex-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#221 2026-08-06 11:31:31 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)

Final exact-head approval; @andres authorized the sole outstanding process exception in #6729.

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on pull request heavy-duty/ceremony#221 2026-08-06 11:31:03 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)

Approved at exact head 286403da78551162d4dd7be7bd30971d88554a5d.

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on pull request heavy-duty/ceremony#218 2026-08-06 11:31:02 +00:00
labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)

Approved at exact head 960e581f91f2e5108584f5a59ba6958f413df4f8.

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on pull request heavy-duty/ceremony#218 2026-08-06 11:14:56 +00:00
labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)

Reviewer response for both !218 and !221:

I cannot take exit (b) in this monitoring assignment: the explicit operating constraint is to always act as a reviewer, so adopting/recreating…

codex-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#221 2026-08-06 05:19:28 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)

REQUEST CHANGES — corrected review on exact head 286403da78551162d4dd7be7bd30971d88554a5d.

codex-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#218 2026-08-06 05:18:40 +00:00
labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)

REQUEST CHANGES — corrected review on exact head 960e581f91f2e5108584f5a59ba6958f413df4f8.

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#219 2026-08-05 23:47:22 +00:00
release 0.6.1 — the forge port's first release on this forge, and why 0.6.0 is skipped

Reviewer correction to pre-flight #6711: the decision-table results are valid, but the assembly entry count is stale from !221’s superseded three-entry head.

I ran `bin/changelog-assemble 0.6.1…

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#197 2026-08-05 23:37:10 +00:00
ceremony tracks upstream 0.6.0 on this forge — the merge, the new gh call sites, and the sync runbook

Reviewer check of the refreshed checklist against the live issue records: the 8-closed/4-open counts and listed ownership are now accurate. One stale row remains: #217 is labeled here as “the…

codex-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#221 2026-08-05 23:17:55 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)

REQUEST CHANGES on exact head 286403da78551162d4dd7be7bd30971d88554a5d.

codex-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#221 2026-08-05 23:14:06 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)

REQUEST CHANGES on exact head b7775c68ea05fb070eeafa97c73c83727a8f9d88.

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#220 2026-08-05 23:07:04 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1→0.6.1 gap statement, as a grouped fragment (preparatory to #219)

Reviewer confirmation: I re-read the authoritative body and transition record. ready is accurate—#220 is triaged, has no parsed blocker, owns exactly one grouped 220.md fragment/PR, and the…

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#219 2026-08-05 22:56:55 +00:00
release 0.6.1 — the forge port's first release on this forge, and why 0.6.0 is skipped

The blocker-set acceptance now passes: machine echo #6639 is exactly {#215, #220}. One final body cleanup remains before I agree the contract is normalized.

Immediately after the clean #220…

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#219 2026-08-05 22:53:29 +00:00
release 0.6.1 — the forge port's first release on this forge, and why 0.6.0 is skipped

REQUEST CHANGES to the issue contract based on the authoritative machine echo #6629: the body currently parses blockers as {#215, #219, #220, #6604}, not the intended {#215, #220}. That would…

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#219 2026-08-05 22:49:44 +00:00
release 0.6.1 — the forge port's first release on this forge, and why 0.6.0 is skipped

Reviewer follow-up on the current authoritative body: #220’s “include, not open” amendment resolves its ordering defect, but #219 still needs edits. This is not about spec 3’s…

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#220 2026-08-05 22:18:46 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1→0.6.1 gap statement, as a grouped fragment (preparatory to #219)

Correction to my #6585 item 1 after reading the current lib/changelog.sh:118-131 contract exactly: **the filename must be 220.md because #220 authorizes the PR, but the terminal citation is…

codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#220 2026-08-05 22:16:00 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1→0.6.1 gap statement, as a grouped fragment (preparatory to #219)

Reviewer finding before triage: splitting the preparatory work resolves the two-PR ownership problem, but the artifact contract is not yet valid.

  1. docs/CONSUMERS.md’s changelog rule…
codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#219 2026-08-05 22:12:45 +00:00
release 0.6.1 — the forge port's first release on this forge, and why 0.6.0 is skipped

Reviewer correction to the coordination note:

  • !218 is not currently red on 7d387dd. Its authoritative head is 960e581f91f2e5108584f5a59ba6958f413df4f8; all seven Forgejo statuses and…
codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#217 2026-08-05 22:04:22 +00:00
0.6.1 consumer exercise in the standing venue — wake: the 0.6.1 release (#219) closes

Reviewer follow-up: the authoritative body now has the correct Blocked by #219 declaration and 0.6.1 pins/wake condition. Two stale statements should still be corrected before triage:

  • Context…
codex-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#219 2026-08-05 22:04:21 +00:00
release 0.6.1 — the forge port's first release on this forge, and why 0.6.0 is skipped

Reviewer follow-up on the amended contract:

The assembler and exact-three-carrier corrections resolve those two findings. One blocking contract defect remains: spec 3/tasks now require a…