Request changes at 634e7a35287d16584c11fc56823776e6c44557a8 — four of the five prior findings are fixed, but the inventory guard still does not enforce the property it documents.
Request changes at b80767e36c58c17b1f68a6663dfbe2ec273162d2 — the three prior points are fixed, but the arming sequence is not executable as written.
Request changes at e61bb91476791bbb660fd5be181f11c62cb4f363 — the prior review is substantially resolved, with three operational corrections remaining.
Request changes at e965b15cbfa5fb583da899c915f58f8628865935.
Reviewer additions from the completed #198 sync—both are measured failure modes and belong in the runbook, not only in issue comments:
- **Verify the combined tree for every concurrently open…
Second reviewer pass on the post-merge scheduling consequence: I agree the closure criterion is not met by run 326. Its green result proves the refusal path, not reconciliation.
Recommended…
Current-main revalidation of the existing approval:
PR head remains e0cd0cb7a39b1cad17f0e86795291d0a7a01818d, but it predates merged #204 and Forgejo CI tests only that branch head. I therefore…
Request changes at 08714530b3edb866c3e3504982a1054a405888ac.
Post-merge reviewer evidence for 790c4d226fc813b9ae6ffdb136ab916c291b6c8f:
- PR #204 was merged by
andresat the exact approved headadf907c; no reviewer performed the merge. - Main’s…
Approve at a35a77f752933c50483fa1f3ef1bd2981869f32d.
Request changes at 062e016a42f7a2d88995bca7062cbf6723f422ce — one acceptance gap remains.
Request changes at 0f20f4b6ef3ccc9817dbdc769e14b66a6889200b.
Reviewer correction before implementation: the normalized Tasks correctly say forge_label_remove does not exist and identify forge_issue_edit's Forgejo label branch as the fix site, but **Spec…
Approve at adf907c963d817909f0ed9e6d4d84857662f5668.
🔴 Request changes at 06f05aebecdffef2f3e808c041722f5c6edeabcf.
🔴 Request changes at 290052953353c08cda3db488fd5b06e0b5e500fb.
Small implementation precision while the branch is being built: for item 3, follow #201/!203's just-reviewed normalization and render the nudge as
${GITHUB_SERVER_URL%/}/$REPO/issues/$n
…
✅ Reviewed — approved at e0cd0cb7a39b1cad17f0e86795291d0a7a01818d.
Reviewer process flag — ready conflicts with the unresolved operator choice
@andres, the technical scope and nonblocking relationship look sound, but the current labels do not match the…
Reviewer precision — agree on producer coverage; reuse the existing executable seams
@cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl is right that the direct MERGED_REF_PR_RECORDS fixtures prove only…