glm-bot-andresmgsl
  • Joined on 2026-08-04
glm-bot-andresmgsl commented on pull request heavy-duty/stoke#29 2026-08-19 16:33:40 +00:00
Add label support to issue creation

🔎 reviewing head a62a753656164f66c8a486ad06c3c9d7c2c663e0

glm-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#233 2026-08-19 16:31:27 +00:00
docs: adopt upstream 0.6.1 and 0.6.2 doctrine

Request changes — the doctrine port is complete and faithful (verified independently against upstream tags); one added file turns a repo guard red that passes at the base.

glm-bot-andresmgsl commented on pull request heavy-duty/ceremony#233 2026-08-19 16:22:42 +00:00
docs: adopt upstream 0.6.1 and 0.6.2 doctrine

🔎 reviewing head 78532e077778ecd0b29bfd0013a7869133c4fec7

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#227 2026-08-09 20:43:44 +00:00
docs: record delivered 0.6.1 runner exercise

glm verdict — APPROVE @ 2aafc04

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#226 2026-08-09 18:40:02 +00:00
release 0.6.1

glm verdict — APPROVE @ b104eca

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#225 2026-08-09 15:23:55 +00:00
chore: restore kimi to the review panel (#224)

glm verdict — APPROVE @ 5487f71

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#221 2026-08-06 05:18:15 +00:00
changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)

glm verdict — APPROVE (off-panel, advisory) at 286403d

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#218 2026-08-06 05:16:33 +00:00
labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)

glm verdict — corrected to APPROVE (off-panel, advisory) at 960e581

glm-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#218 2026-08-05 21:49:55 +00:00
labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)

glm verdict — REQUEST_CHANGES (off-panel, advisory), concurring with @codex-reviewer-andresmgsl

glm-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#202 2026-08-05 20:50:44 +00:00
a live forgejo-runner probe venue — every drill repo is archived, so the runner-only half of #192 has nowhere to run

glm review — concur: criteria 1–4 met, deferred exercise properly handed to #217; closeable

@andres — as asked. Off-panel advisory (panel is codex/kimi/cluade); not closing — triage's…

glm-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#209 2026-08-05 20:32:06 +00:00
labels-reconcile HEAD_COMMIT_AT — Forgejo serves a single commit at /git/commits/{sha}, so blocker:unrequested is never judged here

glm — +1 on (a), aligning with @kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl

@andres — you asked all three reviewers here (#6206); @kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl just took (a) (#6361 area), and I concur.

The…

glm-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#205 2026-08-05 20:31:57 +00:00
.github/workflows/labels.yml — the sweep dispatch is gh workflow run, the one gh call site a workflow cannot declare a client for

glm review — concur with option (2): close #205 on its proven transport/wake scope, input-delivery → #215

@andres — responding to #6311. Off-panel advisory (panel is codex/kimi/cluade);…

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#213 2026-08-05 19:24:06 +00:00
.github/workflows/labels.yml — wake the sweep over REST, so a board event reconciles in seconds (#205)

glm verdict — APPROVE (off-panel, advisory) at ed5ce89

glm-bot-andresmgsl commented on issue heavy-duty/ceremony#209 2026-08-05 17:19:24 +00:00
labels-reconcile HEAD_COMMIT_AT — Forgejo serves a single commit at /git/commits/{sha}, so blocker:unrequested is never judged here

glm review — fix verified independently; the literal live set-path isn't exercisable yet, which is triage's call

@andres — responding to your #6206. Off-panel advisory (panel is…

glm-bot-andresmgsl approved heavy-duty/ceremony#207 2026-08-05 14:16:24 +00:00
drills/README.md — the standing runner-probe venue, and why the drill disposal rule does not apply to it (#202)

glm verdict — APPROVE (off-panel, advisory), correcting my RC 1674

glm-bot-andresmgsl suggested changes for heavy-duty/ceremony#207 2026-08-05 14:15:01 +00:00
drills/README.md — the standing runner-probe venue, and why the drill disposal rule does not apply to it (#202)

glm verdict — REQUEST_CHANGES (off-panel, advisory), concurring with @codex-reviewer-andresmgsl