Stamping '## Unreleased' away left main with no heading for a PR
authored before the release to land in, so its entry merged cleanly
into the section that just shipped. The ceremony now re-arms, and
changelog-armed.sh enforces it keyed on VERSION -- so the ceremony
PR's own bare-VERSION tree stays legal (rig#44 / cast#108).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The permission-starvation blocker found on the cast twin (claude-bot,
cast#112 round 4) is identical here: a declared permissions: block zeroes
every unspecified scope, so the decide step's label read and the bump
fallback's gh pr create could only 403 — every genuine ceremony would end
red at the label check. pull-requests: write added with the consumers
named. CONTRIBUTING step 3 and the changelog entry now tell the shipped
story: push-to-main door, event.before interlock, self-re-arm with the
manual path's bump staying the operator's. Re-runs wording nit taken.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 0.7.0 ceremony exposed the gap: the release PR merged with four
approvals and nothing happened, correctly, because publishing hung off a
separate, manual, silent-when-forgotten tag push — the worst failure
shape, no error and no red X. The ship decision already lives in the
release PR, so the merge now IS the release.
release.yml grows a second door: pull_request closed on main, gated on
merged == true AND the hand-set release label (read from the event
payload — no extra permission). Four asserts, in order, each fail-loud
and creating nothing: VERSION at the merge commit is non--dev; VERSION
changed in this PR (merge vs first parent — the -dev interlock that
kills a mislabeled ordinary PR); the version's CHANGELOG.md section
extracts non-empty via the existing release-notes.sh; and no tag or
release exists yet. Then, in the same job, it creates the tag ref at
the merge commit via the API and publishes with gh release create
--verify-tag. Same-job on purpose: a GITHUB_TOKEN-created tag triggers
no workflows (GitHub's anti-recursion), so the tag door can never fire
off it and double-publish, and the no-existing assert covers a manual
tag racing the merge. The tag-push path stays step-for-step identical
as the documented manual fallback and backfill, gated to the push event
so a closed PR never runs it against a branch ref.
CONTRIBUTING.md's Releases section now reads "the maintainer's merge IS
the release", with the manual tag ritual kept as the fallback.
test/release.sh grep-pins the merged+labeled gate, all four asserts,
the same-job tag+publish, and that the tag-push trigger survives — in
the same daemon-free, fail-closed style.
Fixes#96
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
README: the installer's default is the latest release — reproducible,
resolved off the releases/latest redirect, failing loudly rather than
silently handing out main — with the pinned (BOX_REF=<tag>) and dev
(BOX_REF=main) channels beside it. CONTRIBUTING: a release is a PR,
then a tag — the release PR bumps VERSION and stamps the changelog,
the bare X.Y.Z tag on the merge commit triggers release.yml, and
main's VERSION bumps to X.Y.(Z+1)-dev immediately after, because the
versioned layout names install trees after VERSION. Plus the
CHANGELOG entry.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Maintainer direction: body-parsing agreement was a guess, and the machine
must not guess. COMMENTED is now unconditionally a non-verdict; the judgment
that a comment-only reviewer's round passed belongs to the PR AUTHOR, who
escalates by requesting the human's review — an explicit request is a fact,
and it is the machine's top-precedence input. Auto-request survives only for
the no-judgment case: three formal head-current approvals. CONTRIBUTING and
LABELS.md state the handoff; fixtures updated (14 transitions, including
author-escalation and the three-formal-approvals path).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Round-1 blockers, all three reviewers concurring:
- COMMENTED agreement now counts: agreement_signal recognizes the live bots'
durable markers (Verdict: Approve / I agree with everything / leading ✅) —
the gate to needs-human can actually close. Formal verdicts remain the
contract (CONTRIBUTING), this is the documented transitional workaround.
- Every counting verdict is bound to the head SHA; a stale approval parks the
PR in addressing (agent owes re-request) instead of promoting unreviewed
code. CHANGES_REQUESTED blocks at any head, per GitHub's own semantic.
- reconcile serializes under ONE job-level concurrency group; scope stays
per-PR. No more cron-vs-event race on the request-the-human-once guard.
- Sweep resilience: per-PR subshell (one failure logs and continues), label
edits warn instead of wedging; the self-heal claim now matches reality
(dispatch-only bootstrap).
- The state machine is extracted pure (globals in, state out) and sourceable:
test/labels-reconcile.sh proves 14 fixture transitions — comment-only
agreement, stale approval, comment-without-verdict, human precedence and
human-block — wired into CI.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Maintainer rule: a comment-only review is a non-verdict the state machine
(and the board) cannot read. Verdict carries blockingness only; nits ride an
approval, blockers — including verdict-gating questions — are request-changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The machinery LABELS.md promised. labels.yml runs the reconciler on a
15-minute cron plus PR events (pull_request_target — every PR here is from a
fork, where pull_request gets a read-only token; no PR code is ever checked
out). The script derives each open PR's state:* from GitHub's own facts and
converges labels statelessly; stale is judged from real activity (commits,
comments, reviews), never label churn, so the sweep cannot un-stale its own
mark. actions/labeler applies scope:* from changed paths. CONTRIBUTING.md is
the guideline: the PR loop, and who sets which labels. Rehearsed with
DRY_RUN=1 against the live repo; shellcheck-clean.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
