Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
dan-claude-bot
d9bb634a5e fix(labels): sweep on labeled so the handoff is immediate
A review landing was never a trigger for the labels workflow, so the exact
moment `state:needs-human` became true — the third bot approving — fired
nothing, and the label waited on the `*/15` cron. That cron does not run at
its declared rate: measured across box, rig and cast over a two-hour window
on 2026-07-20, one scheduled run each against the eight `*/15` implies.

The obvious fix does not work. There is no `pull_request_review_target`, and
on fork PRs — all of them here — `pull_request_review` runs with a read-only
token and cannot label anything.

So the handoff wakes the sweep itself:

- `pull_request_target` also fires on `labeled`/`unlabeled`
- the author sets `state:needs-human` at handoff, as the third act after the
  round summary and the review request

The author's own label write fires the sweep that validates it — an
optimistic write, not a transfer of ownership. The reconciler confirms or
corrects it seconds later, and the cron falls back to a last resort. It
cannot loop: the reconciler writes with GITHUB_TOKEN, which does not create
workflow runs; agent writes use a PAT, which does.

`labels-reconcile.sh` is unchanged — it already recomputes every open PR
from scratch on every run, which is what makes the optimistic write safe.
The `scope` job is skipped on label events, where no path can have changed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-20 19:44:07 +00:00
dan-claude-bot
00c748c879 fix: verdict contract, head-bound approvals, serialized reconcile — and a testable state machine
Round-1 blockers, all three reviewers concurring:
- COMMENTED agreement now counts: agreement_signal recognizes the live bots'
  durable markers (Verdict: Approve / I agree with everything / leading ) —
  the gate to needs-human can actually close. Formal verdicts remain the
  contract (CONTRIBUTING), this is the documented transitional workaround.
- Every counting verdict is bound to the head SHA; a stale approval parks the
  PR in addressing (agent owes re-request) instead of promoting unreviewed
  code. CHANGES_REQUESTED blocks at any head, per GitHub's own semantic.
- reconcile serializes under ONE job-level concurrency group; scope stays
  per-PR. No more cron-vs-event race on the request-the-human-once guard.
- Sweep resilience: per-PR subshell (one failure logs and continues), label
  edits warn instead of wedging; the self-heal claim now matches reality
  (dispatch-only bootstrap).
- The state machine is extracted pure (globals in, state out) and sourceable:
  test/labels-reconcile.sh proves 14 fixture transitions — comment-only
  agreement, stale approval, comment-without-verdict, human precedence and
  human-block — wired into CI.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-18 19:31:04 +00:00
dan-claude-bot
884a95f5fa feat: label automation — the state reconciler, path-scoped labeler, and CONTRIBUTING
The machinery LABELS.md promised. labels.yml runs the reconciler on a
15-minute cron plus PR events (pull_request_target — every PR here is from a
fork, where pull_request gets a read-only token; no PR code is ever checked
out). The script derives each open PR's state:* from GitHub's own facts and
converges labels statelessly; stale is judged from real activity (commits,
comments, reviews), never label churn, so the sweep cannot un-stale its own
mark. actions/labeler applies scope:* from changed paths. CONTRIBUTING.md is
the guideline: the PR loop, and who sets which labels. Rehearsed with
DRY_RUN=1 against the live repo; shellcheck-clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-18 18:31:54 +00:00