Commit graph

6 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
claude-hdb
4d8a326b96 feat(draft): capture service hostnames via per-service GET (#83)
#73/#81 made a service's per-container hostnames settable (urls) and
readable (GET /services/{uuid} -> applications[].fqdn), and diff/apply
carry them as service_domains — but the draft path was never brought
along: the inventory sweep's environment-list GET does not eager-load
service.applications, so --emit-draft emitted every service with no
hostnames and an UNCAPTURED hand-wave.

Now the draft loop makes the same supplementary per-service GET that
diff/apply make (sibling of #75's per-database backups read — one
design, both reads: ungated for DRAFTED resources only, sequential,
per-resource failure degrades to an UNCAPTURED entry instead of
aborting the whole-instance sweep).

The projection is SHARED, not duplicated: projectServiceDomains is
extracted out of attachServiceDomains and exported, so the draft emits
applications[].fqdn through the exact projection + canonicalization
(canonicalizeServiceDomains) the diff's read-back uses — a drafted
manifest diffs clean the moment it is applied. Its two absences stay
distinct: {} is an answer (no hostnames; nothing emitted, nothing
reported), undefined is "not read" — attachServiceDomains still fails
a one-project diff closed on it, while serviceSpec reports it per
resource and keeps sweeping.

The stale "service hostnames" NO_API_COVERAGE row and the
service_domains (hostnames) always-uncaptured entry are gone, and
semantics.md's "does not yet make the per-service GET" line now tells
the truth.

Closes #83

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-16 18:30:49 +00:00
claude-hdb
1210ae4445 fix(draft): read backup schedules and emit backup blocks (#75)
--emit-draft still told every reader that backup schedules "are not
exposed by Coolify's API" — the exact pre-#51 claim that issue disproved:
GET /databases/{uuid}/backups is a route, and diff/apply have read it on
every run since. The draft path was never brought along, so it warned
instead of reading, and a rebuild from a draft came up with no backups.

Now the draft loop makes the same supplementary per-database GET
(databaseBackupSchedules) for every DRAFTED database and databaseSpec
emits a real backup: { frequency, retention } block for the one shape
the manifest can express — a single, enabled schedule. Ungated on
purpose: fetchLive's opts.backups gate exists because the read-side
sweeps never look at the answer, and the draft is the sweep that does.
The read stays sequential (like the existing per-resource env GETs) and
a failed read degrades to an UNCAPTURED entry per resource rather than
aborting the whole-instance sweep — a draft's reader is a human, not an
apply about to write.

UNCAPTURED keeps only what the route genuinely cannot answer:
- the S3 target: save_s3 now rides on LiveBackup, and a schedule that
  saves to S3 gets a per-database entry saying the target reads back
  only as s3_storage_id, an int nothing maps to a storage UUID
- a DISABLED schedule (declaring the block would make apply re-enable it)
- several schedules where a manifest declares one
- an unreadable route (reported, never read as "no backups")

The stale NO_API_COVERAGE "backup schedules" row becomes "a backup
schedule's S3 target", and semantics.md's draft section now tells the
truth about what is captured.

Closes #75

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-16 18:25:34 +00:00
Daniel Marin
61fd72cea9
Merge pull request #82 from claude-hdb/feat/github-app-binding
feat(draft): resolve a repo's GitHub App by source_id, not the only-App guess (#72 item 8)
2026-07-16 17:44:01 +02:00
claude-hdb
2cbcfd2ef3 feat(draft): resolve a repo's GitHub App by source_id, not the only-App guess (#72)
`inventory --emit-draft` wrote the `github_apps` binding by guessing: with
exactly one App on the instance it bound every repo to it ("no other it
could be"), and with none or several it left a REVIEW marker on all of them.
The audit (#72) showed the binding is READABLE, so the guess was both
unnecessary and, on a single-App instance, silently WRONG for any public
repo (a repo cloned without a GitHub App got bound to the one App anyway).

Every application carries the `source_id`/`source_type` of the App that
clones it — `removeSensitiveData` hides neither (ApplicationsController
v4.1.2) — and `GET /github-apps` returns each App's `id` and `name` (only
`client_secret`/`webhook_secret` are hidden). So the draft now matches the
two: each repo binds to the App its application's `source_id` names. A
GitlabApp/public-repo source (or an instance that will not list its Apps)
resolves to nothing and still gets a REVIEW marker — and a `source_id` that
collides with an App id but carries a non-GithubApp `source_type` is not
mistaken for one.

The biggest gain is the multi-App instance the old heuristic could not
handle at all: it wrote REVIEW on every repo; the lookup resolves each.

semantics.md, the draft header, and the NO_API_COVERAGE row are corrected to
match (the audit's #51 arc: a limitation filed as a defect gets fixed).

`npm run check` clean · 511 tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-16 15:22:40 +00:00
claude-hdb
b560317da0 docs(draft): correct the stale "backup schedules are not exposed by the API" claim (#72)
`draft.ts` still told the operator that a database's backup schedule "is
not exposed by Coolify's API" and is "create-time-only in cast" — in the
`backup` uncaptured flag, its comment, and the NO_API_COVERAGE table. #51
disproved both: `GET /databases/{uuid}/backups` answers, and `diff` and
`apply` now read and write it.

The audit (#72) flags this as the #51 failure mode repeating — a defect
filed as a limitation does not get fixed. semantics.md was already
corrected when #51 landed; this brings draft.ts's three copies of the old
claim in line with it.

What is still true, and now said accurately: the DRAFT path
(`inventory --emit-draft`) does not yet read that route, so no `backup:`
block is captured and a rebuild from a draft still has no backups until
the operator declares one — not because the API cannot express it.

Text-only; no behavior change. `npm run check` clean, tests pass.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-16 14:56:14 +00:00
claude-hdb
e96bab5d79 feat: emit a draft of what a box holds — a proposal, never desired state (#27)
`cast inventory` could already see a whole instance (#22). It can now write
down what it sees, in the shape of cast's own inputs:

    cast inventory --env prod --instance box-b --emit-draft ./draft

    draft/
      environments.yaml                 # bindings as far as they can be read — with the projects: registry (#25)
      incubator/.infra/manifest.yaml    # one per project
      incubator/.infra/env/*.env.template
      la-familia/.infra/manifest.yaml   # …including the client sites nobody ever declared
      secrets/<project>.<env>.env.age   # encrypted to a recipient you name
      UNCAPTURED.md                     # ← the important file

Two uses: bootstrapping a project that has no manifest (the third-party sites
on the box being drained were never declared, and never will be unless
something writes the first draft), and a point-in-time blueprint.

A DRAFT IS A PROPOSAL. It is never desired state, and `apply` never reads it:

    sweep → emit draft → a human reads it → manifest PR → capture → apply

Same shape as `terraform import` → HCL, and the boundary is enforced, not
merely documented. It never emits into a repo that already has a manifest —
for a declared project the manifest IS the truth, and one regenerated from a
live box would let that box's accumulated cruft overwrite a reviewed spec, in
the one direction nobody reviews. Adoption is one-way. So: a non-empty target
refuses, a manifest at the path it would write refuses, and --emit-draft with
a repo positional refuses (that is the reconcile path, and it is exactly the
case where a draft must not be written).

Two things would make a draft actively dangerous, and both are the point:

1. COPIED PROVIDER-GENERATED VALUES. A DATABASE_URL read off the source points
   at the SOURCE box's Postgres; rebuild elsewhere and the new box comes up
   WORKING, reading and writing the old box's database, and you find out the
   day the old box is deleted. So the draft applies capture's discipline: a
   provider-generated name is placeheld with the same GENERATED_PLACEHOLDER
   literal, its live value is written into no artifact, and the emitted
   manifest declares it under generated_secrets: so a later capture placeholds
   it again with no flag to remember. The rule is by NAME — Coolify's SERVICE_*
   magic vars, and any name carrying a datastore word and a connection word —
   and it errs wide, because over-matching a real secret is loud and
   recoverable while under-matching a generated one is silent and is not.
   Every other var becomes a ${REF} with its value in the age store, never a
   literal in a committed file: cast cannot know which of a box's vars are
   secret, and a live key written as a literal is a key in a git repo.

2. SILENT LOSSES. UNCAPTURED.md is a first-class output, emitted on every run:
   per resource, every live setting cast saw and could not express —
   destinations (#21), service hostnames, Basic Auth/Traefik labels, backup
   schedules, database kinds cast does not model, env names a template cannot
   hold — plus what no API in 4.1.2 will tell it, and the table of what a
   blueprint still cannot restore (the GitHub App private key and the S3 keys:
   re-create by hand). A blueprint that omits these without saying so is worse
   than no blueprint, because in a disaster you would trust it and rebuild a
   different box.

Secrets are encrypted to a recipient you NAME (--recipient, or the
environment's age_recipient binding). With neither, cast refuses rather than
quietly emitting a draft that looks complete and holds not one value;
--no-secrets says so deliberately. A project with resources in two populated
environments is a tie cast will not break — it refuses, and --environment says
which, as a tiebreak rather than a filter (filtering by name would drop the
client sites, each alone in Coolify's default `production`, out of a blueprint
that claims to describe the box).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-13 20:32:25 +00:00