43 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
43 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
|
# 0.4.1 — drill record
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Run 2026-08-01 by `dan-claude-bot` against release PR (Refs #212), candidate
|
||
|
|
branch `build/212-release-0-4-1` on `heavy-duty/ceremony` main at `c2987fd`.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Scope ruling — doors unchanged, no disposable-repo rehearsal
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The 0.4.0 drill (drills/0.4.0.md) probed both release doors end-to-end in a
|
||
|
|
disposable repo, and the live 0.4.0 release then exercised the merge door for
|
||
|
|
real: one tag, one release, main re-armed to `0.4.1-dev`. Since that tag,
|
||
|
|
`release.yml`'s only delta is the `CEREMONY_SELF_REF` pin line — no door
|
||
|
|
logic, no decide table, no publish step changed. Re-running a full
|
||
|
|
disposable-repo drill would rehearse machinery this repo already proved both
|
||
|
|
in rehearsal and in production within the last three days. This record
|
||
|
|
therefore rests on the standing evidence below, and says so honestly rather
|
||
|
|
than staging a ceremony for a tree the doors cannot distinguish from the last
|
||
|
|
one. The panel reviews this claim like any other; if any reviewer rules a
|
||
|
|
full drill owed, that verdict wins.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Standing evidence at the candidate head
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
| # | probe | where | result |
|
||
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
|
|
| 1 | decide + merge-door step-replay (dogfood) | `release-exercise / step-replay (dogfood)` on this PR | CI-gating; green required to merge |
|
||
|
|
| 2 | decide + merge-door step-replay (consumer) | `release-exercise / step-replay (consumer)` on this PR | CI-gating; green required to merge |
|
||
|
|
| 3 | fragment chain: armed → assemble → monotonic | `release-exercise / fixture-chain` on this PR | CI-gating; green required to merge |
|
||
|
|
| 4 | the real tree's own guards (armed, monotonic, drill-recorded, self-ref) | `self-guards` on this PR | CI-gating; green required to merge |
|
||
|
|
| 5 | the 0.4.1 payload live: split labels machinery dogfooding on this very PR | this PR's checks | `labels / scope` + `labels / trigger` green, and NO `labels / reconcile` check attached — the #209 acceptance shape, observed on the first post-split PR in this repo |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Probe 5 is the one piece 0.4.0's drill could not have covered: the sweep
|
||
|
|
split is 0.4.1's payload, and this repo adopted it on merge (#211 split
|
||
|
|
`self-labels.yml` / `self-labels-sweep.yml`). Every PR opened after that
|
||
|
|
merge — this one included — is a live consumer-shaped proof that PR checks
|
||
|
|
carry scope and trigger only, with sweeps dispatched to the detached
|
||
|
|
`self-labels-sweep` runs.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Deviations
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
No candidate-ref deviation arises: this record stages no scratch caller, so
|
||
|
|
nothing needs to resolve `CEREMONY_SELF_REF: "0.4.1"` before the tag exists.
|
||
|
|
The sibling crew migration is the post-tag consumer proof, per #212's
|
||
|
|
acceptance criteria.
|