docs(builder): restore the re-request deferral and three clauses the audit found

This commit is contained in:
cndgrr 2026-08-04 13:36:41 +00:00
parent b4779bbc18
commit 4800aef363

View file

@ -157,13 +157,14 @@ such as the panel roster live in that repo's own CONTRIBUTING.)
runner outage, a flaky dependency, a failure already on the default
branch — and only where the request says so and names the evidence ("the
same job fails identically on `origin/main` at `<sha>`"); silence about a
red check is what is prohibited. *Green* is a ruled term (operator,
2026-07-27), read in two steps. **First take the check's word at this
head**: its newest entry by start time — not completion, a cancelled run
outliving its replacement's start — and never a `CANCELLED` entry while
the same check has a non-cancelled one there. A check whose entries at
the head are all cancelled has not reported at all and is not green, the
gate collapsing alike (#139, #276). **Then classify that entry by
red check is what is prohibited, and an argued exception shifts the
burden to the author. *Green* is a ruled term (operator, 2026-07-27),
read in two steps. **First take the check's word at this head**: its
newest entry by start time — not completion, a cancelled run outliving
its replacement's start — and never a `CANCELLED` entry while the same
check has a non-cancelled one there. A check whose entries at the head
are all cancelled has not reported at all and is not green, the gate
collapsing alike (#139, #276). **Then classify that entry by
`conclusion`, never `status`**, which can disagree with it (#259). No
conclusion is not green: a configured run in progress is waited on, and
waiting is compliance, not a stall. Cancelled or stale is not green,
@ -188,7 +189,8 @@ such as the panel roster live in that repo's own CONTRIBUTING.)
approvers included**; one left un-re-requested can never approve the tree
you shipped (#26, #39). Only where the head did not move — answered with
argument or evidence, nothing pushed — do you re-request just the
non-approvers (#94). **The re-request carries the same
non-approvers, the engine absorbing a re-request at an unchanged head —
its mechanism crew's to describe (#94). **The re-request carries the same
green-check-at-head precondition**, argued exception included: a fix push
whose check comes up red is your next fix, not the panel's. Prefer
verification over argument — add the test that settles the doubt.
@ -248,9 +250,11 @@ event**, not its `Default:` deadline or the last activity (#50 D13D14):
- **at 12h:** do not fire a stale default — re-read it against what has
landed, and where doubt has appeared, make it a hard block.
- **at 24h:** proceed regardless, **as a PR**: pick an option and say in the
body which way you went and what doubt remains. Nothing merges by this.
body which way you went and what doubt remains. Nothing merges by this;
the human still gates the merge.
- **past 24h:** hand the choice to triage, which picks the option, records
it as a decision, and stays accountable; the operator can overturn it.
it as a decision, and stays accountable; the operator can overturn it at
merge.
A re-flag starts a fresh ladder, which applies whatever `Default:` says,
hard block included, and an active back-and-forth still climbs it — unlike
@ -276,4 +280,5 @@ the Round log, mirrored from each whole-round reply. The label write is
optimistic — the reconciler validates it and takes it back if the PR is not
mergeable-right-now. Then stop: the PR is the human's, and the claim parks
as shape 4 (Picking, above), that comment its declaration and your slot
free. Address what comes back (`state:addressing`) and re-hand-off alike.
free. Address what comes back (`state:addressing`) and re-hand-off the same
way.