docs: define the attention contract
This commit is contained in:
parent
90a42b16b0
commit
7791f2100e
4 changed files with 36 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -49,6 +49,10 @@ triage bug, and the move is to say so on the issue, not to guess.
|
|||
([#52](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/52)) and `offsite`
|
||||
([#68](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/68)) exemptions
|
||||
already guard — a parked claim nobody can name is an abandoned one.
|
||||
- **Pick up `attention` before anything else.** On your claim, first post a
|
||||
short pickup comment and remove `attention`; the removal is the ack. A
|
||||
demand on a parked claim is usually its unpark, so take the slot back under
|
||||
the existing rule below rather than leaving the demand parked.
|
||||
- **Unparking is a claim like any other.** When the wait ends, the parked
|
||||
issue is work again and takes the slot. If you are already active
|
||||
elsewhere, finish or release that work first, and say which you did on
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ so entries say what changed, cite the issue, and stop.
|
|||
|
||||
## Unreleased
|
||||
|
||||
- `attention` doctrine — define its assignee-owned pickup, ack, queue and clock semantics across labels, triage, and builder roles (#85).
|
||||
- `attention` — add the issue-only, hand-set assignee-demand flag to the core label taxonomy (#84).
|
||||
- `issueflow-reconcile` — keep cross-repo references out of local dependency decisions and require triage to resolve cross-repo blockers by hand (#61).
|
||||
- `needs-ruling` — the cross-cutting flag for a pending human decision, excluded from `state:needs-human` and from the staleness sweep (#51).
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
27
LABELS.md
27
LABELS.md
|
|
@ -140,6 +140,33 @@ repaired, and epic-completion and PR-side stale behavior are unchanged. The
|
|||
sweep tells the assignee once when every visible cross-referenced PR has
|
||||
closed; it only tells, and never clears the flag or changes the claim.
|
||||
|
||||
`attention` is issue-only and says a demand is parked on an issue for its
|
||||
assignee. Anyone who needs that assignee's hands — triage, the operator, or a
|
||||
sibling agent — sets it. The assignee alone clears it, as the first act of
|
||||
pickup together with a short comment; that removal is the acknowledgement
|
||||
and re-arms the flag for the next demand. If the session dies before the ack,
|
||||
the still-visible flag launches the next pickup instead. An unanswered flag
|
||||
is auditable evidence on the board.
|
||||
|
||||
The flag is additive: it composes with `ready`, `claimed`, or `blocked` and
|
||||
with `needs-ruling`, and never substitutes for queue state. It pauses no
|
||||
clock. Unlike `offsite` and `needs-ruling`, which make silence legitimate,
|
||||
unanswered `attention` is exactly the silence the 48-hour reclaim should
|
||||
take. It is hand-set doctrine only: nothing in `actions/` sets, clears,
|
||||
reads, or validates it, and no reconciler enforces the assignee requirement.
|
||||
An `attention` issue without an assignee is therefore a board bug, not a
|
||||
demand; anyone may assign it or remove the flag.
|
||||
|
||||
The three signals are mutually distinct: `attention` means an assignee owes
|
||||
a move; `needs-ruling` means a human owes a decision under
|
||||
[the escalation contract and ladder](BUILDER.md#the-ruling-ask); and a bare
|
||||
`@`-mention is an FYI that demands nothing and remains perfectly fine. A
|
||||
demand that is itself a human decision carries `needs-ruling`, never both.
|
||||
This distinction records the
|
||||
[#16 missed-ruling incident](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/16#issuecomment-5061051198)
|
||||
and why the rejected mention poll is not returning: ordinary thread traffic
|
||||
re-arms mentions, but only the writer can declare that a move is owed (#83).
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope — which surface? (PRs and issues, any number)
|
||||
|
||||
All scopes share one calm color, `#C5DEF5` — scopes locate, states alert. The
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -55,7 +55,10 @@ is the failure this whole flow exists to prevent.
|
|||
([#50 D13–D14](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/50)). You set
|
||||
the flag, so you also close it out ([LABELS.md](LABELS.md)): judge when
|
||||
agreement is reached, record the ruling as a decision in one comment,
|
||||
remove the label, and return the issue to its flow in that same comment.
|
||||
remove the label, and return the issue to its flow in that same comment;
|
||||
when that ruling or any directive or answered builder question delivers
|
||||
the assignee's next move in prose, set `attention` in the same comment.
|
||||
This is not a substitute for minting work or for `needs-ruling`.
|
||||
4. **Decline.** Real idea, wrong repo or wrong time. Say why plainly, link
|
||||
where it belongs if anywhere, close. A refusal with reasons is a good
|
||||
outcome; a zombie discussion is not.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue