fix: TRIAGE.md cites the real #151 needs-ruling comment; BUILDER.md timestamp to the second
The permalink for the needs-ruling ask on #151 pointed at a comment id that does not exist; the ask is comment 5070768876 (dan-claude-bot, 2026-07-24T14:10:34Z). Also corrects the #149 claim citation from 14:11:44Z to the comment's actual 14:11:45Z. Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9d73878cc
commit
baf0c04f1f
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ triage bug, and the move is to say so on the issue, not to guess.
|
||||||
on the labels against stale prose, say so in the claim — name the
|
on the labels against stale prose, say so in the claim — name the
|
||||||
events you read, their timestamps and their actor, and invite the
|
events you read, their timestamps and their actor, and invite the
|
||||||
correction if the read is wrong;
|
correction if the read is wrong;
|
||||||
[the 14:11:44Z claim on #149](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/149#issuecomment-5070781295)
|
[the 14:11:45Z claim on #149](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/149#issuecomment-5070781295)
|
||||||
is the exemplar. Refusing is not a resting place either:
|
is the exemplar. Refusing is not a resting place either:
|
||||||
[*"I am not claiming through that contradiction"*](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/149#issuecomment-5070776624)
|
[*"I am not claiming through that contradiction"*](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/149#issuecomment-5070776624)
|
||||||
was a correct instinct and an incomplete move — the next step is to
|
was a correct instinct and an incomplete move — the next step is to
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ is the failure this whole flow exists to prevent.
|
||||||
write that re-read only the thread races it. Both 2026-07-24 failures —
|
write that re-read only the thread races it. Both 2026-07-24 failures —
|
||||||
[a header correction on #149](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/149#issuecomment-5070758613)
|
[a header correction on #149](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/149#issuecomment-5070758613)
|
||||||
asserting a hold 58 seconds after its lift, and
|
asserting a hold 58 seconds after its lift, and
|
||||||
[a `needs-ruling` ask on #151](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/151#issuecomment-5070774657)
|
[a `needs-ruling` ask on #151](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/issues/151#issuecomment-5070768876)
|
||||||
the operator's label events had answered 132 seconds earlier — are this
|
the operator's label events had answered 132 seconds earlier — are this
|
||||||
sentence's absence.
|
sentence's absence.
|
||||||
Past 24 hours from the current episode's `labeled` event, if the ruling
|
Past 24 hours from the current episode's `labeled` event, if the ruling
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue