Commit graph

8 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
adf907c963 fix(198): the action fails closed, the caller decides scheduling, the guard decides the forge (#198)
All checks were successful
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m2s
CI / release-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 10s
CI / self-guards (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / action-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / docs-sync-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s
Refs guard / refs-not-closing (pull_request) Has been skipped
labels / labels (pull_request) Successful in 46s
@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl's second review, both points taken.

The refs action goes back to `forge_preflight || exit 1`. 97e63ac had it exit 0
with a notice so the PR check would not be red, and that conflated two
different questions: "this action cannot produce a verdict" is the ACTION's
contract and must stay a refusal, while "this check should not block the
board" is the CALLER's decision. The caller now carries it —
refs-guard.yml skips unless github.server_url is github.com, mirroring
forge_detect positively. A skipped check is a green head; an action that
reports success it did not earn is not. The leaked preflight_err temp file
goes with the revert.

The workflow guard asked the wrong question. `command -v gh` alone passes the
moment a Forgejo runner image happens to ship gh, and then dispatches against
a forge that cannot serve it — the client/forge mismatch forge_preflight
exists to prevent. It decides the FORGE first now, mirroring forge_detect
positively, and the binary second. The source guard splits to match: a
declaration guarded only by binary presence is reported, with a fixture that
fails on exactly that shape.

The warning text was also wrong on the facts, as noted: issue-event sweeps ARE
this caller's event-driven wakes, so they are precisely what is lost. It now
says the hourly scheduled sweep survives and every event-driven wake through
this caller does not, until #205.

Point 1 of that review — jq 1.6 accepting an empty payload — was already fixed
in 728102a, pushed before the review landed.

Verified under the runner's jq 1.6 as well as 1.7: 28 test files, 0 failed
both ways. shellcheck 0.10.0 (CI's pin), actionlint, self-ref, marker,
vendored, changelog-armed all clean with every file tracked.

Refs #198
2026-08-05 12:30:28 +00:00
97e63acef0 fix(refs-not-closing): report and skip on a forge it cannot speak, rather than reddening every PR (#198)
Some checks failed
CI / test (pull_request) Failing after 3m2s
CI / release-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 11s
CI / self-guards (pull_request) Successful in 7s
CI / action-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / docs-sync-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s
Refs guard / refs-not-closing (pull_request) Successful in 5s
labels / labels (pull_request) Successful in 45s
The first head's `Refs guard` failed on this PR, correctly: spec 4's
CEREMONY_FORGE_CLIENT=gh declaration made forge_preflight refuse by name on
this forge. But that workflow runs on every pull request here, so the
declaration as first written turns every future PR red until #199 lands —
blocking the board for a gap that already has its own issue.

Refusing and scheduling are different questions. This action must never
produce a verdict from a graph it did not read, and it does not: on a forge it
cannot speak it now says so by name, cites #199, states that no verdict was
produced, and reaches the forge zero times. A preflight failure for any other
reason stays fatal, and on a forge it CAN speak nothing changes.

Also: five SC2016 findings in test/no-runtime-gh.test.sh. They were invisible
locally because shellcheck-all.sh lints TRACKED files and the guard was still
untracked when I ran it — a new file is exactly the case that check cannot
see. Verified this time against CI's pinned shellcheck 0.10.0 with the file
committed.

test/run.sh: 28 test files, 0 failed, under CI's CEREMONY_REQUIRE_* env.
shellcheck, actionlint, self-ref, marker and vendored guards all clean.

Refs #198
2026-08-05 12:09:05 +00:00
e035130f65 merge upstream 0.6.0 onto the forge tree, and port every gh call site it brought (#198)
Some checks failed
CI / test (pull_request) Failing after 33s
CI / release-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / self-guards (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / action-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s
CI / docs-sync-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s
Refs guard / refs-not-closing (pull_request) Failing after 5s
labels / labels (pull_request) Successful in 43s
`git merge` of upstream `8c3a4d1` onto `dad99dd`, common ancestor `84bb1a4`.
18 hunks in 10 files; `lib/forge.sh`, `lib/forge-github.sh` and
`lib/forge-forgejo.sh` conflict in none and come out byte-identical.

The resolutions the issue decided: VERSION and both CEREMONY_SELF_REF
carriers take upstream's numbers; `.github/labels.conf` and `drills/0.4.1.md`
keep this forge's; CHANGELOG keeps both sides and names the upstream commit
this tree carries.

The part the hunks did not contain. Upstream's 0.5.0/0.6.0 work added whole
functions to files this tree already owned, so `git merge` took its side
without raising a conflict — and with them, EIGHT runtime `gh` call sites
that #188 had removed. Seven are ported onto the shim: two reads and four
comment writes in issueflow-reconcile, and labels-reconcile's HEAD_COMMIT_AT
read. The eighth is `gh workflow run` in labels.yml, which a workflow cannot
declare a client for and whose Forgejo equivalent this instance answers with
500 rather than a 4xx — named with its reason rather than ported on a guess.

test/no-runtime-gh.test.sh makes the rule mechanical, because reviewing the
diff could not: four reviewers reading it each found a different subset, and
the contract suite stubs `gh`, so a reintroduced call site passes it.

Three seams the resolution decides are silent when resolved wrongly, and each
now has a case that fails on the wrong one: the merged record's `merged_at`
third column (without it every sort key ties and the highest PR number comes
back), the open gather's one-BODY-row-per-line feed (a whole decoded body as
one record loses every declaration including the first), and the whole-board
read whose COLLISION_FLAGS/WINDOW_FLAGS consumers auto-merged.

The open gather carries CLOSING rows as well as BODY rows. `Refs` alone would
drop every `Closes #N` link on the open side and reclaim a claim the PR was
holding — the existing base64 round-trip case is red without it.

actions/refs-not-closing declares CEREMONY_FORGE_CLIENT=gh: its only gather
is GraphQL, which Forgejo does not serve at all. #199 ports it.

test/run.sh: 28 test files, 0 failed. shellcheck and actionlint clean.

Refs #198
2026-08-05 11:56:23 +00:00
Andriujose
360b262c47 fix: satisfy refs guard shellcheck 2026-08-03 21:00:40 +00:00
Andriujose
022d1fcda6 fix: exercise refs guard action boundary 2026-08-03 20:58:56 +00:00
Andriujose
869d05bf85 fix: satisfy CI shellcheck gate 2026-08-03 20:34:35 +00:00
Andriujose
66b136efc0 docs: wire refs guard into ceremony flow 2026-08-03 20:31:34 +00:00
Andriujose
dcf72a9af8 feat: add refs-not-closing guard core 2026-08-03 20:29:51 +00:00