`git merge` of upstream `8c3a4d1` onto `dad99dd`, common ancestor `84bb1a4`.
18 hunks in 10 files; `lib/forge.sh`, `lib/forge-github.sh` and
`lib/forge-forgejo.sh` conflict in none and come out byte-identical.
The resolutions the issue decided: VERSION and both CEREMONY_SELF_REF
carriers take upstream's numbers; `.github/labels.conf` and `drills/0.4.1.md`
keep this forge's; CHANGELOG keeps both sides and names the upstream commit
this tree carries.
The part the hunks did not contain. Upstream's 0.5.0/0.6.0 work added whole
functions to files this tree already owned, so `git merge` took its side
without raising a conflict — and with them, EIGHT runtime `gh` call sites
that #188 had removed. Seven are ported onto the shim: two reads and four
comment writes in issueflow-reconcile, and labels-reconcile's HEAD_COMMIT_AT
read. The eighth is `gh workflow run` in labels.yml, which a workflow cannot
declare a client for and whose Forgejo equivalent this instance answers with
500 rather than a 4xx — named with its reason rather than ported on a guess.
test/no-runtime-gh.test.sh makes the rule mechanical, because reviewing the
diff could not: four reviewers reading it each found a different subset, and
the contract suite stubs `gh`, so a reintroduced call site passes it.
Three seams the resolution decides are silent when resolved wrongly, and each
now has a case that fails on the wrong one: the merged record's `merged_at`
third column (without it every sort key ties and the highest PR number comes
back), the open gather's one-BODY-row-per-line feed (a whole decoded body as
one record loses every declaration including the first), and the whole-board
read whose COLLISION_FLAGS/WINDOW_FLAGS consumers auto-merged.
The open gather carries CLOSING rows as well as BODY rows. `Refs` alone would
drop every `Closes #N` link on the open side and reclaim a claim the PR was
holding — the existing base64 round-trip case is red without it.
actions/refs-not-closing declares CEREMONY_FORGE_CLIENT=gh: its only gather
is GraphQL, which Forgejo does not serve at all. #199 ports it.
test/run.sh: 28 test files, 0 failed. shellcheck and actionlint clean.
Refs #198
Thirty-five fragments assembled into '## 0.6.0 — 2026-08-05'; VERSION to
bare 0.6.0; the three CEREMONY_SELF_REF carriers stamped "0.6.0" in this
one commit; the three docs/CONSUMERS.md availability markers cleared to
name 0.6.0 — refs-not-closing (#218), the RELEASES.md mirror entry (#248)
and the vendored-manifest completeness guarantee (#251).
drills/0.6.0.md opens with the measurement that decides its shape: the
doors-unchanged conditions do NOT all hold at this candidate, because
lib/changelog.sh moved on the release path since the last rehearsed tag
0.4.0. A full disposable-repo rehearsal is owed and is in progress; the
record is committed early and filled from the runs as they happen.
Refs #249.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The section is re-assembled: main's merge base now carries two fragments
(188.md and 191.md), so 0.4.1 publishes with the door port it actually
ships, and neither fragment survives its own release.
drills/0.4.1.md takes main's two-run record, with run 1's disclosures
restored — the scratch repo it used, its candidate ref, and the ~8 minutes
it spent public to read job logs. A later success does not retire a
disclosed deviation.
The 0.4.1 drill measured both doors dead on Forgejo. lib/facts.sh gathered
`released` with `gh release view` and `labeled` with `gh api .../pulls`, and
release.yml tagged and published with `gh` — none of which exist on the
runner image. The merge door therefore read labeled=no for a correctly
labeled, correctly merged ceremony PR and refused it as "a bare push";
the tag door cleared every gate and died at `gh release create`.
Both are ported onto lib/forge.sh. Two asymmetries were measured against
the live instance and its swagger rather than assumed:
* GitHub serves an ARRAY of PRs at /commits/{sha}/pulls; Forgejo serves a
single OBJECT at /commits/{sha}/pull and 404s on the plural. Both verbs
emit the array shape, so facts.sh carries one jq expression.
* GitHub creates a tag by POSTing to /git/refs; Forgejo serves that path
GET-only and creates tags at /tags. A 1:1 port of the gh call would
have 404'd forever.
The behaviour change is the second half of the bug. Any failure used to
become a definite `no`, which is safe for row 4 and catastrophic for row 5:
it is how a missing binary became "this was not a release ceremony". Now a
completed read that finds nothing is still `no` and still fail-closed, and a
read that did not complete refuses and emits no fact at all.
Four new cases in test/facts.test.sh cover exactly that, and a mutation back
to the old fail-closed-on-error behaviour kills all four and nothing else.
1014 assertions, 22 suites, shellcheck and actionlint clean.
Refs #191
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The three stamps, in one commit as the ceremony requires: VERSION goes
bare, the self-ref pin follows it, and the changelog section is the
assembler's output rather than a hand edit.
0.4.1 is the forge release. Everything in the section comes from #188's
single fragment: ceremony stops being gh-only. `lib/forge.sh` selects a
backend from the runner's own environment, `lib/forge-github.sh` and
`lib/forge-forgejo.sh` implement one call surface twice, and the
reconcilers preflight before they sweep — so a GitHub-shaped client
pointed at a Forgejo instance is a named refusal instead of a sweep that
reads nothing and reports success.
Verified on this instance before stamping: the first post-merge `labels`
run on main (7fc9afe, task 467) came back SUCCESS — the reconciler's
first green run on Forgejo, and the evidence the section's claims are
not merely asserted.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Five fragments assembled into '## 0.5.0 — 2026-08-03' (#205#216#221#224#226); VERSION to bare 0.5.0; the three CEREMONY_SELF_REF carriers
stamped "0.5.0" in this one commit; the panel-rows unreleased marker in
docs/CONSUMERS.md cleared to name 0.5.0; drills/0.5.0.md records the
doors-unchanged ruling with the measurements as they are at 0ac3a6f.
Refs #233.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Consume the two displacement-fix fragments into the 0.4.1 section, stamp
VERSION and every CEREMONY_SELF_REF carrier, and record the doors-unchanged
drill ruling with the candidate-head evidence table.
Refs #212
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Stamp 2 is one assembler-produced edit; changelog-armed's rule is stated
mode-first (fragment, then legacy, #112 D7/D8/D9); changelog-assembled
gets its operator section (#116); monotonic records D10; the two rewritten
error strings and the retired re-arm recovery follow (#117).
Round 1's shared blocking catch: release-exercise's call job proves the
parse but executes no steps (both doors are push-gated, by design), and
fixture-chain drives the scripts, not the workflow. The new step-replay
job executes the merge door's early sequence for real — both checkout
shapes including path: .ceremony-src, both branches of the bypass via a
matrix standing in for the repository test, the CEREMONY_DIR wiring, and
facts → decide → notes through genuine $GITHUB_OUTPUT plumbing — against
a fixture tree with a stubbed gh. Wired into PR CI as standing evidence;
PR-only, because a push-to-main workflow_call would hand release.yml the
merge door's exact gate. release.yml's honest-gap paragraph narrows to
what stays untested until #11: the doors themselves.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes#9. .github/workflows/release.yml (workflow_call) replaces box's,
rig's and cast's release.yml: the merge door (facts -> decide -> notes ->
tag+publish+bump, every decision in a tested lib script) and the tag door
(the manual fallback and backfill, no bump). Plus lib/facts.sh (the merge
door's impure half, contract-tested against fixture repos with a stubbed
gh), the self-ref pin guard (.github/scripts/self-ref-check.sh + CI step +
tests), the release-exercise scratch caller (dry wiring), the end-to-end
script-chain rehearsal, and the caller + artifact-hook contracts in
docs/CONSUMERS.md.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
