2 commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl	f3f7538d15	docs(upstream-sync): stale in-flight branches, and auditing post-merge runs by executed steps (#200) ... @codex-reviewer-andresmgsl's two additions (#5697), both measured in the #198 sync rather than anticipated. Every branch open across a sync is stale afterwards: Forgejo never re-tests an open PR when main moves under it, so #206 and #207's green 22-file suites were about a tree that no longer existed once the 28-file one landed — and #206's fragment was individually green while making the combined tree red under a rule the sync itself introduces. The runbook now says to update each in-flight branch from the newly synced main, or check them in a scratch merge, and that a prior approval is evidence about the tree it was given on. And post-merge runs are audited by executed steps, never by colour: inventory what the sync changed about triggers and jobs, read which job actually ran, and treat a green refusal path as evidence for that path only. Run 326 was green and had reconciled nothing. Both failures happened with the no-runtime-gh guard green and CI green, so the runbook says that too. Refs #200	2026-08-05 13:42:21 +00:00
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl	e965b15cbf	docs: the recurring upstream sync, its standing resolutions, and a guard on where the delta lives (#200) ... The third child of #197, written immediately after performing the sync it describes, while the findings are still first-hand. docs/UPSTREAM-SYNC.md carries the procedure and the six standing resolutions, each with the issue that decided it, so they are not re-argued every sync. The parts that are not obvious from the outside, and that the 0.6.0 sync paid to learn: * THE AUDIT STEP. `git merge` takes upstream's side wherever only upstream moved a region, so a function upstream ADDED to a file this tree owns arrives with no conflict and no question. Reviewing the hunks cannot find it — four reviewers read the same diff and each found a different subset. That was eight runtime `gh` call sites in three files and two file types. * THE SAME MECHANIC APPLIES TO STATE. A resolved region can remove a producer whose consumers auto-merged, and those consumers degrade to empty rather than erroring, so nothing goes red. Three such seams in one sync. * VERIFY WHERE IT RUNS. "Green locally" was wrong three times, for three different reasons: shellcheck-all lints TRACKED files so a new file's first lint is meaningless; CI pins shellcheck 0.10.0; and the runner's jq 1.6 exits 0 where 1.7 exits 4 on `jq -e` with empty input — which was not a test problem but a guard accepting an unreadable read. * TEST THE MERGE RESULT. Forgejo tests heads, never what two branches produce together, and two green PRs did produce a red tree in this sync. * AFTER MERGING, CHECK THE SWEEP RECONCILED SOMETHING. The first post-merge run was green and had done nothing. .upstream-ref records the carried commit in machine-readable form beside the CHANGELOG's prose. test/upstream-delta.test.sh asserts every forge-DECIDING file is named in the inventory — offline, comment-aware, and refusing rather than skipping when the ref is missing. Shim CONSUMERS are allowed by name, so a seventh consumer is silent and a seventh decider is not. docs/CONSUMERS.md now states that two ceremonies answer to the same version number and how a consumer says which one it pinned. Must-fail, both from the issue's test plan: scattering a forge_detect branch into an unlisted file reds the guard; blanking .upstream-ref reds it too. test/run.sh 29 files 0 failed under jq 1.7 and jq 1.6; shellcheck 0.10.0, actionlint, self-ref, marker, vendored and changelog-armed all clean. Refs #200	2026-08-05 13:36:17 +00:00