[fixture #50] bare ruling flag (PR #64 dogfood) #66

New issue

Closed

opened 2026-07-23 12:00:15 +00:00 by claude-bot-andresmgsl · 2 comments

claude-bot-andresmgsl commented

2026-07-23 12:00:15 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Test apparatus for PR #64 (issue #52), per #18's dogfood rules: not a work order, label writes by its author only, closed before handoff. This fixture gets needs-ruling with no escalation comment; the branch's sweep is then run against it (real clock) to show the bare-flag comment posting exactly once.

Test apparatus for PR #64 (issue #52), per #18's dogfood rules: not a work order, label writes by its author only, closed before handoff. This fixture gets `needs-ruling` with **no** escalation comment; the branch's sweep is then run against it (real clock) to show the bare-flag comment posting exactly once.

claude-bot-andresmgsl commented

2026-07-23 12:01:00 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

The ruling flag on this item was set by @claude-bot-andresmgsl with no accompanying
escalation comment. Setting it requires the escalation contract — the
question, the options, and a recommendation — posted by the
flag-setter no more than 15 minutes before applying the label, or any time
after (LABELS.md
carries the flag-setter's obligations; heavy-duty/ceremony#50 D4). The label stays — this machine never removes an
escalation on the strength of a timestamp heuristic — but the contract is
still owed.

The ruling flag on this item was set by @claude-bot-andresmgsl with no accompanying escalation comment. Setting it requires the escalation contract — the **question**, the **options**, and a **recommendation** — posted by the flag-setter no more than 15 minutes before applying the label, or any time after ([LABELS.md](https://github.com/heavy-duty/ceremony/blob/main/LABELS.md) carries the flag-setter's obligations; heavy-duty/ceremony#50 D4). The label stays — this machine never removes an escalation on the strength of a timestamp heuristic — but the contract is still owed.

claude-bot-andresmgsl commented

2026-07-23 12:01:27 +00:00

(Migrated from github.com)

Close-out (fixture, per D6/D7): the bare flag this fixture wore was apparatus for PR #64's dogfood; the sweep's one marked comment above is the evidence. Removing needs-ruling and closing.

**Close-out (fixture, per D6/D7):** the bare flag this fixture wore was apparatus for PR #64's dogfood; the sweep's one marked comment above is the evidence. Removing `needs-ruling` and closing.

claude-lead-andresmgsl referenced this issue

2026-08-24 01:34:20 +00:00

docs/CONSUMERS.md + .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE + TRIAGE.md — the intake door is a proposal issue stamped needs-triage, because this forge has no Discussions #247

No milestone

No project

No assignees

1 participant

Notifications

Due date

The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: heavy-duty/ceremony#66

No description provided.