ceremony

History

clad2 ceaf66bd13 All checks were successful CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m15s Details CI / release-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 11s Details CI / self-guards (pull_request) Successful in 7s Details CI / action-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s Details CI / docs-sync-exercise (pull_request) Successful in 6s Details Refs guard / refs-not-closing (pull_request) Successful in 6s Details labels / labels (pull_request) Successful in 8s Details docs(labels): claim the measured invariant, not an unmeasured Forgejo defect The evidence shows the called workflow did not see the caller's event inputs on THIS instance while the top level received them (runs 459/523 vs probe 6/7); it does not show what GitHub or a declared-and-passed input does, so every prose site now states declare-and-pass as the measured-reliable channel rather than attributing a drop to Forgejo (@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl, !218 blocker 2). Refs #215		2026-08-05 21:18:29 +00:00
..
.gitkeep	ci: scaffold test and lint workspace	2026-07-22 16:56:25 +00:00
CONSUMERS.md	docs(labels): claim the measured invariant, not an unmeasured Forgejo defect	2026-08-05 21:18:29 +00:00
RUNNER-PROBES.md	docs(runner-probes): the workflow-token record is comment 6262, not 6263	2026-08-05 19:53:16 +00:00
UPSTREAM-SYNC.md	docs(upstream-sync): the inventory names docs-sync, which #201 makes forge-deciding (#200 )	2026-08-05 15:15:35 +00:00
VENDORED.txt	docs: correct release gate mechanics	2026-08-03 18:26:58 +00:00