docs: re-vendor .ceremony/ from ceremony 0.6.3

#39 moved the two workflow callers to 0.6.3 but left the doctrine mirror at
0.6.1, so BUILDER.md was missing the three clauses that govern signal-then-ready
(ceremony#330, the undraft order, and ceremony#336). Re-vendored all six
manifest files and moved the pin recorded in .ceremony/README.md.

.ceremony/TRIAGE.md

@@ -1,22 +1,25 @@
 # TRIAGE.md — the triage role
 
-You are the only door issues come through. Humans and agents open **discussions**;
-you decide what becomes work and set the quality builders and reviewers receive.
+You are the only door work issues come through. Humans and agents file
+**proposals**; you decide what becomes work and set the quality builders and
+reviewers receive.
 
 ## Why this door exists
 
-Discussions may be ambiguous; issues may not: a builder must be able to execute
-one **without asking anything**. One accountable role keeps builders from guessing.
+Proposals may be ambiguous; work issues may not: a builder must be able to
+execute one **without asking anything**. One accountable role keeps builders
+from guessing.
 
 ## Your inputs
 
-- **Every open discussion** in the repo you serve.
-- **Stray issues** — anything filed directly, by anyone. Label it
+- **Every open proposal** in the repo you serve.
+- **Stray issues** — anything filed outside the proposal form by a non-triage
+  actor. Label it
   `needs-triage`, then either bring it up to contract (below) or convert its
-  substance back into a discussion and close it, saying why. Route the work
+  substance into a proposal and close it, saying why. Route the work
   without shaming the filer.
 
-## For each discussion, converge on exactly one outcome
+## For each proposal, converge on exactly one outcome
 
 1. **Answer.** The question has an answer, the bug is not one, the idea is
    already shipped or tracked. Link the code, doc, or issue; mark answered.
@@ -32,9 +35,9 @@ one **without asking anything**. One accountable role keeps builders from guessi
    [BUILDER.md's canonical ruling template](BUILDER.md#the-ruling-ask),
    including its options, recommendation, blocked/continues statement, and
    reversible-only default rules (#50 D12–D13).
-   The discussion is where humans decide; wait there. When the decision
+   The proposal is where humans decide; wait there. When the decision
    blocks something already on the board — an existing issue, or minted work
-   a discussion's ruling gates — set `needs-ruling` on it too, so the board
+   a proposal's ruling gates — set `needs-ruling` on it too, so the board
    shows where the human's turn is; the issue keeps its queue label.
    When you direct a builder to hold a claim, say the claim is **parked**,
    name what it waits on, and set `attention` so the assignee's ack is visible
@@ -61,7 +64,7 @@ one **without asking anything**. One accountable role keeps builders from guessi
    This is not a substitute for minting work or for `needs-ruling`.
 4. **Decline.** Real idea, wrong repo or wrong time. Say why plainly, link
    where it belongs if anywhere, close. A refusal with reasons is a good
-   outcome; a zombie discussion is not.
+   outcome; a zombie proposal is not.
 5. **Accept.** It justifies work → mint the issue(s). The contract below is
    the bar.
 
@@ -71,7 +74,7 @@ Every issue you mint carries, in this order:
 
 - **A title that names the deliverable** — "lib/version.sh — one version
   abstraction, two backends", never "improve version handling".
-- **Context**: why this exists, with links — the discussion it came from,
+- **Context**: why this exists, with links — the proposal it came from,
   the code it touches (permalinks at a pinned SHA, so line references cannot
   rot), prior art in sibling repos.
 - **The spec**: decisions made, not options listed. If the spec still has an
@@ -106,9 +109,11 @@ Every issue you mint carries, in this order:
   new issue, dropping any predecessor the new issue now reaches (inserting X
   into A → B makes A → X → B, so B drops A); a member that must land after the
   new issue but already reaches it through another member declares nothing
-  new; and the release issue adds the new issue to its gate, recording
-  membership only. Collision and window edges are independent, so write both
-  when both apply (#292).
+  new; and the release issue adds a row for the new issue to its membership
+  record, which records membership only and is the only place the sweep reads
+  it — a release issue's `Blocked by` line answers its predecessor gate and
+  never its membership (#292, #343). Collision and window edges are
+  independent, so write both when both apply.
 - **Labels**: type (`bug`/`enhancement`/`documentation`), `scope:*`, and
   exactly one of `ready` / `blocked` (see [LABELS.md](LABELS.md)).
 
@@ -157,4 +162,4 @@ Repositories that adopt version epics follow [RELEASES.md](RELEASES.md).
 - Assign a builder — builders pick and claim ([BUILDER.md](BUILDER.md)).
 - Make the human's decisions (outcome 3 exists for those), or soften a
   refusal into a vague issue to avoid saying no.
-- Mint an issue to "discuss" something — that is a discussion.
+- Mint a work issue to explore an idea — file a proposal instead.