forked from heavy-duty/ceremony
4f3fc2a20b
Refs #189. Round 1 on #191 (codex blocking, kimi nit). codex caught that advancing the stamp to crew@4da17c4 made the attention section false. It did, and the error is mine in kind, not only in detail: a reconciliation stamp is a claim about the WHOLE file against that tree, and I audited only the ci-red surface across a 17-commit advance. That is the #187 failure mode, on the PR that closes #189. What was false at the pinned SHA, all from the crew#66 ruling (danmt, 2026-07-27) landing in d578150e: - "One wake is registry-independent, by design: attention" — no wake is exempt now. _attention_partition splits rows against the registry; OUT rows are reported and never acted on. - "the assignment is what carries the authorization — there is nothing here for a repo list to scope" — this is the position the ruling REJECTED. The cost was argued first: a cross-repo handoff now waits on an operator adding the repo, which is why an out-of-scope demand also pings the operator over the boot-gate channel rather than only reaching duty.log. - "a fix that bounds this wake to the registry would re-create the #16 incident" — that fix landed, with the ping as its mitigation. - The parenthetical calling crew's repos-default.txt header a contradiction "raised there as a discussion" — the discussion is crew#66, it was ruled, and crew's header now names the attention wake explicitly. This file was preserving the losing side of a settled question. Also in range and owned by this section: d849f166 ledgered the wake, so "a session that dies before acking is relaunched; that is the whole crash-recovery story" no longer is. Dying relaunches; COMPLETING without acking is a decline, and the ledger stops it re-firing until the issue moves. Meaning, not mechanism, so it belongs here. Re-audited the rest of the advance rather than spot-fixing: fleet.roster still declares itself the TARGET environment (the roster paragraph holds), and the roster/install commits touch role resolution inside crew, which this file does not describe. kimi's nit, which the earlier rewrite made mine: the paper inventory counted one row while the triage-signals bullet marks a second. Both are needs-ruling rows and both are now named — a number that has to be recounted every time a wake lands is the thing that went wrong. 18/18 test files; changelog_fragment_problem OK; shellcheck, self-ref and git diff --check clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
27 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
27 lines
1.6 KiB
Markdown
### Changed
|
|
|
|
- `BUILDER.md` gates both review-request points on a green check at the
|
|
head, carries crew#45's argued exception for failures outside the PR,
|
|
and states the ruled classification: cancelled and stale are not a
|
|
green head; skipped and neutral are (#189).
|
|
- `BUILDER.md` documents CI-red recovery in pickup precedence: a red head
|
|
of your own PR is picked up before claiming another issue, is never a
|
|
parked claim, and follows crew#17's recovery path (#189).
|
|
- `FLEET.md` writes the ci-red wake into the duty order between resume
|
|
and build, now as deployed engine rather than on paper: the
|
|
reconciliation stamp advances to the crew SHA carrying crew#64 (#189).
|
|
- `FLEET.md` describes the build wake's check gate as the engine
|
|
implements it: a green head, or one with no checks configured, opens a
|
|
round; a red head and an unfinished one are held and reported
|
|
separately (#189).
|
|
- `FLEET.md` corrects the attention wake to the crew#66 ruling: the query
|
|
is cross-repo, the action is registry-bounded, and an out-of-scope
|
|
demand is reported and escalated to the operator rather than worked. It
|
|
no longer claims attention is exempt from the registry (#189).
|
|
- `FLEET.md` distinguishes an attention session that dies before acking,
|
|
which relaunches, from one that completes without acking, which is a
|
|
decline a ledger keeps from re-firing (#189).
|
|
- `BUILDER.md` re-requests by head, not by verdict: a push while
|
|
answering a round stales every approval, so every panelist is
|
|
re-requested; only an unchanged head re-requests the non-approvers
|
|
alone (#190).
|