ceremony/changelog.d/215.md
clad2 ceaf66bd13 docs(labels): claim the measured invariant, not an unmeasured Forgejo defect
The evidence shows the called workflow did not see the caller's event inputs
on THIS instance while the top level received them (runs 459/523 vs probe
6/7); it does not show what GitHub or a declared-and-passed input does, so
every prose site now states declare-and-pass as the measured-reliable channel
rather than attributing a drop to Forgejo (@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl, !218
blocker 2).

Refs #215
2026-08-05 21:18:29 +00:00

33 lines
1.4 KiB
Markdown

### Fixed
- The sweep's `bootstrap` value crosses the `workflow_call` boundary as a
declared input, explicitly passed by the caller — the one channel measured
to work; the called workflow did not see the caller's event inputs as an
implicit substitute on this instance (#215).
- Before the bridge, `github.event.inputs` was empty inside the called
workflow, so every dispatch-woken sweep bootstrapped: ~20 label upserts on
each board event (#215).
- The caller maps an empty top-level value to `no` explicitly, so a
cron-woken sweep can never bootstrap; the declared input also defaults to
`no`, so a consumer that passes nothing gets the safe path (#215).
- The gate feeds the declared input to `labels-reconcile` unchanged, so an
invalid value meets the action's own `yes|no` refusal instead of being
silently coerced (#215).
- `docs/CONSUMERS.md`'s published sweep stub carries the same pass-through —
without it every consumer inherits the defect ceremony fixed for
itself (#215).
### Added
- `test/labels-bootstrap.test.sh` pins the bridge at every hop: the declared
boundary, both gate sites as the identity, no expression reading
`github.event.inputs`, and the caller and stub pass-throughs
byte-exact (#215).
- The same test drives the four value paths — schedule-empty, `no`, `yes`,
invalid — through the shipped expressions into the action's real
validator (#215).