forked from heavy-duty/ceremony
Term 4. GitHub clears requested_reviewers when a verdict lands, so the field
answers "who still owes a verdict" by itself. Forgejo never clears it —
measured: rig!140 listed all three panelists with all three verdicts in, and
rig!146 still lists three while MERGED, so the field is stale even on a
closed PR.
Read raw on Forgejo that is not a cosmetic over-count. `requested` drives
three decisions, and a permanently-true field pins a PR at
state:bots-reviewing for life and stops blocker:unrequested from ever being
true: the sweep believes a round is live forever and no staleness can
correct it.
So the requested set is intersected with who has NOT submitted a verdict for
the current head, derived from /pulls/{n}/reviews — the read that is true on
both forges. On GitHub the filter removes nothing, because the field is
already accurate; term 5 holds by construction rather than by care.
A STALE approval — an approval of an older head — still owes a verdict. That
is the case that matters: treating it as answered would let a stale round
read as complete, which is the shape #136 exists to prevent.
Mutation-verified both ways: reading the field raw again reds three cases,
and treating STALE as answered reds two.
Also documents @grok-reviewer-andresmgsl's ask (#4763): every panel= account
must be able to read the repo, or the forge refuses the review request —
422 naming the account on Forgejo. A real failure mode for private
consumers, and it fails loudly rather than sweeping blind.
Refs #188
2 KiB
2 KiB
Added
lib/forge.sh— the forge selector:forge_detectnames the forge from the runner's own environment,forge_clientnames the client it needs, andforge_preflightrefuses loudly before any sweep when the two disagree (#188).- The reconcilers and
labels-scoperun that preflight first, so a GitHub-shaped client on a Forgejo instance is a named refusal instead of a sweep that reads nothing and reports success (#188). lib/closes_references.sh— the closing-keyword parser, sibling ofrefs_references, so "which issues does this PR close" is answered from a PR body rather than from GitHub's GraphQL API (#188).lib/forge-github.shandlib/forge-forgejo.sh— one call surface, two backends, selected byforge_select; no forge branching at the call sites (#188).- The forgejo backend proves each paginated gather complete against the
server's
x-total-countand refuses loudly when it cannot — a missing header is a refusal, not a pass (#188).
Changed
-
issueflow-reconcilegathers open and merged PRs over REST instead ofgh api graphql. Forgejo serves no GraphQL at all, so the two queries were replaced rather than translated; both forges returnnumberandbodyfrom/pullsin the same shape (#188). -
forge_apiowns the page size, because each forge silently ignores the other's parameter:per_page=100reads 30 items on Forgejo andlimit=100reads 30 on GitHub, both HTTP 200. No call site names one (#188). -
Outstanding review requests are derived from the reviews on the current head rather than from
requested_reviewers, which Forgejo never clears — read raw there, a PR would sit atstate:bots-reviewingforever (#188).
Fixed
labels-reconcileandlabels-scopeno longer exit 0 on a Forgejo consumer having read zero facts — measured onheavy-duty/rig, where the sweep printedreconciled.over an empty PR list and scope reported "no labeler.yml" for a file that exists (#188).