rig/drills/README.md
dan-claude-bot 11dfeb2ecd refactor: one drill record per version, in drills/
Drill records move from sections inside drill/RUNS.md to one file per
version at drills/<version>.md.

The old guard had to parse headings: an em-dash prefix match, an optional
" — DATE" tail, a whole-version comparison so 0.3.0-rc1 could not satisfy
0.3.0, and a separate non-blank-body rule. All of it existed only because
records shared one file, and both sibling repos shipped a defect out of
that complexity in review — a `sed '/./,$!d'` extractor where `.` matches
a space (box#149, cast#138), and heading-grammar drift. One file per
version makes nearly all of it unrepresentable: 0.3.0.md and 0.3.0-rc1.md
are different files, and the filesystem does the whole-version comparison.

The awk drill_section() machinery is gone. What survives is the one rule
splitting the files does not make unrepresentable: a file of only
whitespace is not a record.

Plain drills/, NOT .drills/ — a dot-directory is invisible to globs
without dotglob, the cause of #70 here and box#116/box#118.

drill/RUNS.md is deleted; it was created in this same unmerged PR, held no
real records, and its useful reasoning moves to drills/README.md. (box
keeps ITS drill/RUNS.md — that one is a genuine harness log.)

Also corrects the ordering framing in CONTRIBUTING and the new README: the
three repos' drills are INDEPENDENT, run in any order. What makes that safe
is that each pins the same fixed set of candidate refs, so box and rig
measure the same pair — that, not sequencing, is what dissolves the mutual
recursion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 16:35:51 +00:00

5.4 KiB

Drill records

Per-release evidence for rig's real-hardware drill. One file per version, named for the version exactly as VERSION carries it:

drills/<version>.md

So 0.3.0 is recorded in drills/0.3.0.md, and 0.3.0-rc1 in drills/0.3.0-rc1.md. They are different files, which is the whole point: the filesystem does the whole-version comparison that an earlier single-file version of this had to do with an awk extractor and a heading grammar. A record for the candidate cannot be mistaken for evidence for the final.

The directory is drills/, not .drills/ — a dot-directory is invisible to any glob without dotglob, which is how #70 here and box#116 / box#118 all happened.

This directory is the record, not the instrument. rig has no drill harness script of its own; its legs are run by following the documented procedure, and the harness lives in heavy-duty/box's drill/. rig does not reach into it to decide whether rig may ship: a cross-repo lookup that fails silently degrades to "pass", which is the UNREADABLE-vs-NONE shape #90 fixed. The gate reads a file in this repo, and nothing else.

What the gate requires

.github/scripts/drill-recorded.sh runs on every PR. On a -dev tree it asserts nothing — a development tree has no release to evidence. On a bare VERSION — a release ceremony tree — it requires drills/<version>.md to exist and to hold at least one non-whitespace character. An empty file, or one of only spaces and tabs, is not a record (box#149 and cast#138 both shipped an extractor where a single tab satisfied the gate).

The guard requires a record, not a passing result. A maintainer waiver is a legitimate outcome of a release — but it is written in that version's file, so that skipping the drill is a deliberate, reviewable commit rather than a silence. A failed drill is still a valid record: the gate wants evidence, not success.

The drill

rig's legs:

  • tenant guests minted and converged via box
  • bash test/db-integration.sh against a real Postgres on the machine
  • the GitHub runner lifecycle — register, take a job, deregister — against a fork
  • a coolify install

box and rig are mutually recursive: rig bootstrap --host yes installs box and runs box's setup-host, while box's guests converge back through rig's installer. Within a single drill you naturally bring the substrate up before probing it — a host before a guest — but that is how you run a drill, not an ordering rule between repos.

The three repos' drills are independent. Run them in any order, on any schedule, in separate sittings. What makes that safe is that every drill pins the same fixed set of candidate refs: rig's drill runs --host yes with BOX_REF=release/<box-version>, so it exercises the box that will actually ship; box's drill mints with RIG_REF=release/<rig-version>, so it exercises the rig that will actually ship. Both measure the same pair.

That — not sequencing — is what dissolves the box↔rig recursion. The refs are static identifiers that exist as soon as the release branches do, long before any drill runs, so a cycle at runtime becomes two independent tests against one fixed pair. It also means candidate refs, not released artifacts: RIG_REPO/RIG_REF are mint-time environment variables, so no repo has to be released before another can be drilled. Drilling the candidate is drilling the release, because a release PR's diff is VERSION + CHANGELOG.md and nothing executable differs.

Each repo drills in a different way and asserts a different thing: rig asserts convergence (a machine reaches its role, idempotently), box asserts the isolation contract (the VM trust boundary), cast asserts promotion (A→B reproduces, the diff is idempotent). Three different exercises sharing a substrate, not three phases of one script — which is exactly why the records are per-repo.

Drills that share a substrate share one run ID; each repo records its own legs in its own file, citing that run ID and the other repos' commit SHAs, so the records can be joined after the fact. If a defect shows up only in the combination: patch, re-drill, re-record. The three releases converge on a set that holds together; they are not required to be right in one pass. Releases do not have to be published in a fixed order.

What a record should contain

What ran, on what host, the pinned candidate refs, the numbers, and what failed. Below is the shape, in a file named drills/9.9.9.md — a version that can never collide with a real release. No drill has been recorded here yet; this log starts empty rather than reconstructing runs from memory, since an invented number is worse than no number.

# Release drill — 9.9.9 — 2026-01-01

Run ID: drill-2026-01-01-a. Host: bare Debian 13 cloud image, 4 vCPU / 8 GB.
Candidate refs: box@1a2b3c4 (BOX_REF=release/0.4.0), rig@5d6e7f8, cast@9a0b1c2.

| Leg | Result |
| --- | --- |
| tenant guests minted + converged via box | 3/3 |
| re-converge (idempotence) | clean, no changes |
| `test/db-integration.sh` | 14/14 |
| runner lifecycle against a fork | PASS — registered, took a job, deregistered clean |
| coolify install | PASS, ~6 min |

Failed: `rig users apply` left one revoked key in `authorized_keys`
(filed #NNN). Everything else clean.

State what failed. A record with no failures listed reads as "nothing broke", so if a leg was not run, say that instead of omitting it.