619 commits

This branch

This branch

All branches

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
codex-bot-andresmgsl	f0f3907618	test: exercise GitHub review-request selector	2026-08-24 14:42:36 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	22865aba54	test: preserve superseded request question names	2026-08-24 12:46:42 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	f05e83a562	docs: record live review request fix	2026-08-24 12:43:33 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	6f5ce8f994	fix: drive round state from live review requests	2026-08-24 12:42:11 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	0160f6a883	fix: read live review requests from each forge	2026-08-24 12:38:03 +00:00
andres	7bdae45c98	Merge pull request 'docs: prepare 0.6.2 upstream release notes' (#248) from build/246-upstream-release-fragment into main ... Reviewed-on: #248 Reviewed-by: glm-bot-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-bot-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: claude-bot-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-24 12:06:54 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	d0f5e40fa1	docs: record upstream 0.6.x release notes	2026-08-24 10:54:49 +00:00
andres	68b304d713	Merge pull request 'fix(labels): grade Forgejo review states' (#244) from codex-bot-andresmgsl/ceremony:build/235-forgejo-review-vocabulary into main ... Reviewed-on: #244 Reviewed-by: glm-bot-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: claude-bot-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-bot-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-24 00:16:46 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	1cd46028ed	test(labels): guard Forgejo comment ingestion	2026-08-23 23:29:09 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	c2cca7c1be	test(labels): mark indirect filter probe call	2026-08-23 23:17:14 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	58e58f2ada	fix(labels): grade Forgejo review states	2026-08-23 23:13:05 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	e5ebbf57fb	test(labels): reproduce Forgejo review vocabulary gaps	2026-08-23 23:11:11 +00:00
andres	17a13685a7	Merge pull request 'fix: distinguish Forgejo mergeability states' (#242) from codex-bot-andresmgsl/ceremony:build/236-forgejo-mergeable into main ... Reviewed-on: #242 Reviewed-by: kimi-bot-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-bot-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: claude-bot-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-23 22:52:09 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	8f9f7e560f	docs: record Forgejo mergeability fix	2026-08-23 17:41:41 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	d3b7984a30	fix: distinguish Forgejo mergeability states	2026-08-23 17:41:10 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	2029c9f520	test: pin Forgejo mergeability distinctions	2026-08-23 17:40:06 +00:00
andres	1f5dd39a98	Merge pull request 'feat: record release window membership separately' (#239) from codex-bot-andresmgsl/ceremony:build/230-membership-record into main ... Reviewed-on: #239 Reviewed-by: glm-bot-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-bot-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: claude-bot-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-23 16:58:12 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	ad23842fe2	docs: define release membership records	2026-08-23 01:08:35 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	9a37db4b18	feat: derive release windows from membership records	2026-08-23 01:06:54 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	b7a2b31f84	feat: parse release membership records	2026-08-23 01:02:53 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	d493c993b7	test: drive release membership records	2026-08-23 01:01:17 +00:00
andres	f69224cddc	Merge pull request 'test: update roster drift fixture' (#237) from codex-bot-andresmgsl/ceremony:build/232-roster-fixture into main ... Reviewed-on: #237 Reviewed-by: claude-bot-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-bot-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-bot-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-23 00:52:04 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	832a41b647	test: update roster drift fixture	2026-08-22 22:22:53 +00:00
andres	4f887a756f	Merge pull request 'docs: adopt upstream 0.6.1 and 0.6.2 doctrine' (#233) from codex-bot-andresmgsl/ceremony:build/229-upstream-doctrine into main ... Reviewed-on: #233 Reviewed-by: claude-bot-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-bot-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-bot-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-22 22:16:23 +00:00
claude-lead-andresmgsl	27f702a018	fix: roster names the renamed triage identity ... Second leg of the same debt #232 records. The operator renamed cluade-bot-andresmgsl to claude-bot-andresmgsl on 2026-08-20, closing the misspelling; the account kept its id so history followed it, but the roster compares logins as strings and went on naming the old form. Both functional carriers move together, as #232's spec requires: the `panel=`/`triage-actors=` lines and the CONTRIBUTING identity table. The conf/prose sync guard is why they cannot move apart. Verified: `test/labels.test.sh` is 43/44 before and after — unchanged. The one failure is #232 spec item 4 (the `glm-reviewer-andresmgsl` fixture at :249, now a no-op mutation), which is untouched here and remains that issue's only outstanding work. Historical attributions elsewhere stay as written, per triage's 2026-08-17 ruling recorded on #232. Refs #232	2026-08-20 23:23:30 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	9f07c91faf	docs: group the 229 changelog fragment	2026-08-20 01:36:32 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	78532e0777	docs: define post-merge release edge handling	2026-08-19 03:51:49 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	df4782ced9	docs: clarify builder waits and handoff ordering	2026-08-19 03:51:20 +00:00
codex-bot-andresmgsl	d12cc3d84f	docs: route vendored doctrine through the manifest	2026-08-19 03:50:10 +00:00
cluade-bot-andresmgsl	c2ef6a2fc2	fix: roster names the renamed -bot identities ... Emergency operator-authorized hotfix, sibling of crew 36c6745: engine and sweep panel requests fail on the pre-rename -reviewer names. ceremony#232 records the debt and verifies. Authorized by @andres in-session.	2026-08-17 22:50:13 +00:00
andres	dbe58517dc	Merge pull request 'docs: record delivered 0.6.1 runner exercise' (#227) from issue-217-runner-consumer into main ... Reviewed-on: #227 Reviewed-by: cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-09 21:09:36 +00:00
Codex Review	2aafc04018	docs: record delivered 0.6.1 runner exercise	2026-08-09 20:35:49 +00:00
github-actions[bot]	5693bee9f3	chore: bump main to 0.6.2-dev — a dev install must not impersonate 0.6.1	2026-08-09 19:47:02 +00:00
andres	338cf5f754	Merge pull request 'release 0.6.1' (#226) from release-0.6.1 into main ... Reviewed-on: #226 Reviewed-by: cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-09 19:43:10 +00:00
Codex Review	b104eca141	docs: record 0.6.1 Forgejo rehearsal	2026-08-09 18:20:49 +00:00
Codex Review	ba3b17af88	release: stage 0.6.1 ceremony	2026-08-09 16:12:18 +00:00
andres	0371f2cfd6	Merge pull request 'chore: restore kimi to the review panel (#224)' (#225) from issue-224-kimi-panel into main ... Reviewed-on: #225 Reviewed-by: cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+1@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-09 15:38:11 +00:00
Codex Review	5487f71ef8	chore: restore kimi to review panel (#224)	2026-08-09 14:57:09 +00:00
andres	a953884826	Merge pull request '.github/labels.conf + CONTRIBUTING + labels.test — the panel names an identity that can actually review (#222)' (#223) from build/222-panel-glm into main ... Reviewed-on: #223 Reviewed-by: kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-06 18:32:33 +00:00
andres	b7a6aedc52	Merge pull request 'changelog.d/220.md — the 0.4.1 → 0.6.1 gap statement (#220)' (#221) from build/220-gap-fragment into main ... Reviewed-on: #221 Reviewed-by: kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: codex-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+2@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-06 16:53:16 +00:00
andres	b63637b478	Merge pull request 'labels-sweep — pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at (#215)' (#218) from build/215-bootstrap-bridge into main ... Reviewed-on: #218 Reviewed-by: kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+4@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: glm-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+5@heavyduty.builders> Reviewed-by: codex-reviewer-andresmgsl <andres+2@heavyduty.builders>	2026-08-06 16:53:04 +00:00
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl	2b49d6ef59	fix(labels): the panel names an identity that can actually review (#222) ... kimi-reviewer-andresmgsl is temporarily unavailable, and with a three-identity panel it sits in the required set for every possible author — so no new PR could converge while it is down. glm-reviewer-andresmgsl takes the seat. The roster guard from #195 is bidirectional, so three files move together: the conf, CONTRIBUTING's table, and the test's table-side mutation, which must name an identity the table carries or it stops testing anything. Refs #222	2026-08-06 11:33:42 +00:00
clad2	286403da78	docs(changelog): drop the entry that pre-decided #219 spec 6 ... 'By decision rather than omission' published a back-tagging ruling that belongs to the operator and has not been made. The fragment's authorized scope is the measured gap, which the first two entries state (@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl, !221 review). Refs #220	2026-08-05 23:15:24 +00:00
clad2	b7775c68ea	docs(changelog): the 0.4.1 -> 0.6.1 gap statement, as a grouped fragment ... Three Changed entries naming what a reader comparing the two forges' tags would otherwise reconstruct: 0.5.0/0.6.0 arrived by merge and were never released here; the carried ## 0.6.0 section is upstream's record; and the absent 0.6.0 tag is a decision, not an omission. Verified: eleven fragments assemble cleanly with these entries present, shape/cite guards green. Refs #220	2026-08-05 23:10:25 +00:00
clad2	960e581f91	test(labels): remove the remaining dead event-name assignments ... All three schedule-simulation probes carried the assignment the script no longer reads. This time the head was verified clean BEFORE the push, not after. Refs #215	2026-08-05 21:39:45 +00:00
clad2	7d387dd936	test(labels): drop the now-dead event-name assignment SC2034 flagged ... The script stopped reading GITHUB_EVENT_NAME with the input gate; the previous commit pushed with this red because I trusted an && echo that printed nothing. Refs #215	2026-08-05 21:35:55 +00:00
clad2	6986deede7	fix(labels): the bootstrap keys on the BOOTSTRAP input, never the event name ... The venue drill caught what no hermetic test had: with the workflow_call bridge delivering "no" perfectly, drill runs 16/17 still bootstrapped. The script gated on GITHUB_EVENT_NAME = workflow_dispatch and never read $BOOTSTRAP at all; the wrapper's only coupling was exporting the event name for yes. Correct while an operator's manual dispatch was the only dispatch there was — inert from #209 on, when the trigger job made every machine wake a workflow_dispatch event. Runs 459/523 bootstrapped for this reason, not for the input-delivery defect, which is real but was never the operative cause of the observed re-upserts. The script now gates on ${BOOTSTRAP:-no} = yes; the wrapper passes the input through untouched; the hermetic suite pins the exact regression pair (a dispatch event with no/unset creates and deletes nothing) alongside the yes path's full create+delete assertions. Refs #215	2026-08-05 21:32:21 +00:00
clad2	ceaf66bd13	docs(labels): claim the measured invariant, not an unmeasured Forgejo defect ... The evidence shows the called workflow did not see the caller's event inputs on THIS instance while the top level received them (runs 459/523 vs probe 6/7); it does not show what GitHub or a declared-and-passed input does, so every prose site now states declare-and-pass as the measured-reliable channel rather than attributing a drop to Forgejo (@codex-reviewer-andresmgsl, !218 blocker 2). Refs #215	2026-08-05 21:18:29 +00:00
clad2	69d674cb67	docs(changelog): split the test entry under the 300-character bound ... Pushed the previous commit with this red — the cite check names the bound and I read only the first failure it printed. Refs #215	2026-08-05 21:08:51 +00:00
clad2	baa683211e	fix(labels): pass bootstrap through the workflow_call boundary it was lost at ... A called workflow cannot read the caller's dispatch inputs on this forge: github.event.inputs is empty inside workflow_call even though the top-level caller receives the value in both contexts (probe runs 6/7). The sweep's gate read exactly that, so every dispatch-woken sweep bootstrapped — runs 459 and 523, ~20 label upserts per board event — while the trigger honestly logged bootstrap=no. The bridge, per the #6361 contract: labels-sweep.yml declares workflow_call.inputs.bootstrap (string, default "no"); the dogfood caller and the published CONSUMERS.md stub pass it via with.bootstrap with empty mapped to "no" at the caller — kimi's edge: on schedule the top-level context is empty, and an empty that slipped through would have turned every cron into a bootstrap. The gate feeds the declared input to labels-reconcile unchanged, so an invalid value meets the action's own yes|no refusal. test/labels-bootstrap.test.sh pins every hop: the declared boundary, both gates as the identity, no expression reading github.event.inputs (scoped to ${{ }} bodies — the file's prose names the context to explain it), the two pass-throughs byte-exact, and the four value paths driven through the shipped expressions into the action's real validator. Mutations: dropping the declaration reds 4, dropping the pass-through reds 3, restoring the old gate reds 2. Refs #215	2026-08-05 21:06:29 +00:00