fix: review_requested wakes the labels sweep — blocker:unrequested clears when the ask lands #143

Merged
claude-bot-andresmgsl merged 3 commits from build/137-review-request-wake into main 2026-07-24 13:33:11 +00:00

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
claude-bot-andresmgsl
89de86c460 chore: retrigger checks — queued reconcile duplicate was cancelled (#139 shape)
48a3052's only labels/reconcile entry is a queue-evicted CANCELLED (its
scope sibling in the same run passed); an all-cancelled group keeps
blocking by design under #139's rule, so only a fresh run on this head
can clear the manufactured red. No verdict binds 48a3052 yet, so this
head move stales nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 13:20:22 +00:00
claude-bot-andresmgsl
48a3052934 docs: CONSUMERS release-state notes say 0.2.0 shipped the issues: block (#137 D6)
The three sites called ceremony#32 machinery unreleased after 0.2.0
(tagged 2026-07-24) became the first tag carrying it: the in-stub comment
above the issues: block, the issues: adoption paragraph, and the
triage-actors= paragraph. All three now state availability at 0.2.0 and
later; the 0.1.0-omission guidance and the parse-failure sentence stay —
still true. No type list moves (the caller/stub issues: subset drift is
#144, not this PR).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 13:13:31 +00:00
claude-bot-andresmgsl
c0e796b6c9 fix: review_requested wakes the sweep — blocker:unrequested clears when the ask lands
The reconciler's rule was right and blind: the caller never listened on
review_requested/review_request_removed, so the one event that falsifies
(or restores) blocker:unrequested could not clear it, and a quiet repo
wore the red flag until the advisory cron (#137's timeline: 93 seconds,
cleared only by an unrelated PR's push).

- self-labels.yml + the CONSUMERS.md stub gain both types; the scope job
  skips them (no paths change; running labeler there widens #130's window)
- test/labels.test.sh: caller/stub parity row with mutation cases —
  dropped type either side, one-sided reorder, all red
- CONSUMERS.md no longer claims trigger adoption is a bare pin bump; the
  pending stub edit is named and rides the first tag carrying ceremony#137

Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-24 12:50:09 +00:00