heavy-duty/rig
7
0
Fork 1
Code Issues 10 Pull requests Projects Releases 3 Packages Wiki Activity Actions
rig/changelog.d/109.md
cluade-reviewer-andresmgsl 25d10b084d
Some checks failed
ci / check (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
ci / install (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
ci / db-integration (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
labels / labels (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Details
docs: the changelog fragment cites bare #109 
Maintainer ruling on the issue-number collision raised in the PR body.

CONTRIBUTING's rule is "cite the issue or PR — (#96)", and fragments are
assembled into CHANGELOG.md verbatim, so a fragment is the one place the
convention is actually load-bearing. `forgejo#109` links on neither forge and
would seed a second citation spelling in every future fragment.

The prose distinction stays where it earns its keep: PR bodies and review
comments still write forgejo#N, because that is where a reader has both
numbering schemes in front of them at once.
2026-07-28 09:26:17 +00:00

248 B
Raw Blame History

Added

  • rig forgejo-runner install|status|remove registers a Forgejo Actions runner against an instance, jobs in containers on the box's own dockerd (#109)
  • The template registry can be served from any forge — RIG_TEMPLATES_HOST (#109)